Hello all, To bubble this up in people’s email inboxes — does anyone else in the WG have an opinion on adopting this document or not? Best, Tommy > On Apr 17, 2023, at 2:08 PM, David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > > I support adoption. > David > > On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 8:15 PM Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com <mailto:tpauly@apple.com>> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> This email starts a call for adoption on draft-schwartz-httpbis-connect-tcp (https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-schwartz-httpbis-connect-tcp-01.html). As discussed at IETF 116, this document defines a mechanism to use extended CONNECT (which supports paths and URI templates) for proxying TCP, akin to the UDP proxying support in RFC 9298. This does not deprecate the original use of CONNECT for TCP proxying. >> >> Please reply to this email to indicate if you support adopting this document in this working group. >> >> The call will last for 2 weeks, and end on Monday, May 1. >> >> Best, >> Tommy
Received on Wednesday, 10 May 2023 23:58:05 UTC