- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 13:56:09 +1000
- To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Thanks, Tommy. I've merged that PR. If there are lingering issues -- either on Display Strings or other parts of the spec -- now is a good time to file them, as the issues list for this draft is currently empty. Cheers, > On 15 Jun 2023, at 12:59 am, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> wrote: > > Hello all, > > Thanks for the robust conversation on the addition of display strings! My reading of the list is that we do indeed have rough consensus within the WG to add this support into structured fields. > > Mark, please incorporate any necessary feedback on the PR and merge when ready. > > Best, > Tommy > >> On May 24, 2023, at 7:26 PM, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> wrote: >> >> Hello HTTP WG, >> >> As part of the WGLC for draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis, we’ve been discussing the inclusion of "Display Strings” (strings that allow Unicode content). >> >> While not part of the initial scope of this -bis effort, this addition has had significant discussion and support expressed for inclusion. >> >> This email starts a formal consensus call to determine if the working group would like to expand the scope of draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis to include Display Strings, specifically to merge in the following pull request (modulo any editorial changes that are needed): >> >> https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/2494 >> >> Please reply to this email to express your opinion on this issue by Wednesday, June 7. >> >> Thanks, >> Tommy >> > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 26 June 2023 03:56:18 UTC