Hey, On Wed, 12 Apr 2023, 08:09 Poul-Henning Kamp, <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > -------- > Lucas Pardue writes: > > > Yeah server-timing is one of the headers that sprang to mind when we > reading > > the proposal. Which really focuses the question, who is this data for and > > why should it be added to every request on the wire? > > Because browsers should have a small counter in the top left corner > accumulating the CO2 charges incurred ? > That's one use case we should capture. However, as I mentioned upthread, such reporting/rendering can start way closer to home by looking at client-side contribution. That's not something that needs to weight for an IETF defined HTTP Field. Failure to provide client-side reporting risks creating a perverse incentive to push more work onto the client, which is probably worse from a net perspective. Cheers Lucas > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. >
Received on Wednesday, 12 April 2023 08:16:05 UTC