Re: Call for Adoption: Template-Driven HTTP CONNECT Proxying for TCP

+1, I support adoption. 

Thanks,
Eric


> On May 10, 2023, at 5:32 PM, Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> +1 to adoption and hoping for eventual consistency across our CONNECTed world
> 
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 1:17 AM Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net <mailto:mt@lowentropy.net>> wrote:
>> Thanks for the reminder Tommy.
>> 
>> I'm in favour of normalizing in this direction also.  I hold little hope that we'll eliminate CONNECT as an HTTP feature, but one can maybe dream of it being possible some day.
>> 
>> On Thu, May 11, 2023, at 09:57, Tommy Pauly wrote:
>> > Hello all,
>> >
>> > To bubble this up in people’s email inboxes — does anyone else in the 
>> > WG have an opinion on adopting this document or not?
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Tommy
>> >
>> >> On Apr 17, 2023, at 2:08 PM, David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> I support adoption.
>> >> David
>> >> 
>> >> On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 8:15 PM Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com <mailto:tpauly@apple.com>> wrote:
>> >>> Hello,
>> >>> 
>> >>> This email starts a call for adoption on draft-schwartz-httpbis-connect-tcp (https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-schwartz-httpbis-connect-tcp-01.html). As discussed at IETF 116, this document defines a mechanism to use extended CONNECT (which supports paths and URI templates) for proxying TCP, akin to the UDP proxying support in RFC 9298. This does not deprecate the original use of CONNECT for TCP proxying.
>> >>> 
>> >>> Please reply to this email to indicate if you support adopting this document in this working group.
>> >>> 
>> >>> The call will last for 2 weeks, and end on Monday, May 1.
>> >>> 
>> >>> Best,
>> >>> Tommy
>>