ietf-http-wg@w3.org from October to December 2020 by author

Alex Rousskov

• Re: Optional Connection fields in 1xx messages and Upgrade requests (Thursday, 15 October)
• Optional Connection fields in 1xx messages and Upgrade requests (Wednesday, 14 October)

alex@strugee.net

• Redirections to `Content-Encoding: encrypted` payloads (Thursday, 1 October)

Amos Jeffries

• Re: Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism (Friday, 13 November)

Asbjørn Ulsberg

• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Friday, 27 November)

Austin Wright

• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Wednesday, 4 November)

Barry Leiba

• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (6333) (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7235 (6307) (Friday, 16 October)

Ben Schwartz

• Re: Considering RFC7725bis (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Thursday, 5 November)

Bence Béky

• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: H2 vs responses which should not carry any payload (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: H2 vs responses which should not carry any payload (Friday, 23 October)

Brad Lassey

• Re: Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism (Friday, 13 November)

Carsten Bormann

• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? (Wednesday, 4 November)

Cory Benfield

• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: Priority signals in HTTP/2 (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: [TLS] ALPS and TLS 1.3 half-RTT data (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: [TLS] ALPS and TLS 1.3 half-RTT data (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: [TLS] ALPS and TLS 1.3 half-RTT data (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: Structured Fields: whitespace in binary content (Wednesday, 28 October)

Daniel Stenberg

• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: For discussion: scope for AltSvc and ORIGIN bis efforts (Thursday, 5 November)

David Benjamin

• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Tuesday, 8 December)
• ALPS and TLS 1.3 half-RTT data (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism (Friday, 13 November)

David Schinazi

• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 (Wednesday, 16 December)

Dmitri Tikhonov

• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Monday, 21 December)
• HTTP WG meeting at IETF 109? (Thursday, 1 October)

Elviss Strazdins

• Question regarding RFC 7231 Accept header (Saturday, 26 December)

Eric Lawrence

• RE: H2 vs responses which should not carry any payload (Friday, 23 October)

Erik Nygren

• Re: For discussion: scope for AltSvc and ORIGIN bis efforts (Friday, 6 November)

Glenn Block

• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Friday, 6 November)
• Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: [EXTERNAL] Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Wednesday, 4 November)

Greg Wilkins

• Re: Priority signals in HTTP/2 (Saturday, 19 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: H2 vs responses which should not carry any payload (Sunday, 25 October)

Guilherme Hermeto

• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Wednesday, 4 November)

Henry Story

• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Thursday, 5 November)

Ian Clelland

• Re: Structured Fields: whitespace in binary content (Wednesday, 28 October)

Ian Swett

• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 (Monday, 21 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Saturday, 19 December)
• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 (Saturday, 19 December)
• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism (Friday, 13 November)

IESG Secretary

• HTTP (httpbis) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-10-22 (Thursday, 8 October)
• HTTP (httpbis) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-10-20 (Thursday, 8 October)

IETF Meeting Session Request Tool

• httpbis - Not having a session at IETF 110 (Sunday, 27 December)

internet-drafts@ietf.org

• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-13.txt (Monday, 14 December)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-13.txt (Monday, 14 December)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-13.txt (Monday, 14 December)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-07.txt (Monday, 7 December)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-01.txt (Tuesday, 17 November)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-04.txt (Saturday, 17 October)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-12.txt (Friday, 2 October)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-12.txt (Friday, 2 October)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-12.txt (Friday, 2 October)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-02.txt (Thursday, 1 October)

James Fuller

• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Thursday, 5 November)

James M Snell

• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? (Wednesday, 4 November)

John Wilander

• Re: Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism (Friday, 20 November)

Julian Reschke

• Re: Digest: use in requests (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: Digest: use in requests (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: Digest: use in requests (Monday, 28 December)
• Re: Question regarding RFC 7231 Accept header (Saturday, 26 December)
• Re: Are accept-extension parameters used in practice? (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Sunday, 13 December)
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7231 (6354) (Thursday, 10 December)
• Are accept-extension parameters used in practice? (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: "redirect" files? (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Friday, 27 November)
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (6333) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (6333) (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (6333) (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: A typo in the HTTP SEARCH method draft (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: Structured Fields: whitespace in binary content (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7235 (6307) (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: Structured Fields: last-minute corrections (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: Structured Fields: last-minute corrections (Monday, 5 October)

Lily Chen

• Re: Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism (Friday, 13 November)

Lucas Pardue

• Re: Digest: use in requests (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: Digest: use in requests (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Re: Priority signals in HTTP/2 (Friday, 18 December)
• Status update on Extensible Priorities (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: The future of qlog (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: For discussion: scope for AltSvc and ORIGIN bis efforts (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-02.txt (Thursday, 1 October)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Wednesday, 23 December)
• Re: Are accept-extension parameters used in practice? (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Saturday, 5 December)
• Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Thursday, 3 December)
• On RFC7725bis (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-cdn-control-header-00.txt (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: Considering RFC7725bis (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: RFC7725bis new elements (Thursday, 12 November)
• Considering RFC7725bis (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Friday, 6 November)
• For discussion: scope for AltSvc and ORIGIN bis efforts (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Pre-adoption work on HTTP/2bis (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: Structured Fields: whitespace in binary content (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: Structured Fields: whitespace in binary content (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: Structured Fields: whitespace in binary content (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Structured Fields: whitespace in binary content (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: H2 vs responses which should not carry any payload (Saturday, 24 October)
• DRAFT minutes from the October 2020 interim (Friday, 23 October)
• FYI: Update on cache tests (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: Interested in working on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Reminder: HTTP WG Interim meetings this week (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7235 (6307) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7235 (6307) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: Optional Connection fields in 1xx messages and Upgrade requests (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: Structured Fields: last-minute corrections (Monday, 5 October)
• Structured Fields: last-minute corrections (Monday, 5 October)
• Upcoming interim meeting (Sunday, 4 October)

Martin J. Dürst

• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (6333) (Saturday, 14 November)

Martin Thomson

• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 (Monday, 21 December)
• Re: Priority signals in HTTP/2 (Sunday, 20 December)
• Re: Priority signals in HTTP/2 (Sunday, 20 December)
• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 (Sunday, 20 December)
• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 (Sunday, 20 December)
• Priority signals in HTTP/2 (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 (Thursday, 17 December)
• 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: ALPS and TLS 1.3 half-RTT data (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: For discussion: scope for AltSvc and ORIGIN bis efforts (Thursday, 5 November)

Matthew Kerwin

• Re: Structured Fields: whitespace in binary content (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: Structured Fields: last-minute corrections (Monday, 5 October)

Michael Douglass

• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Thursday, 5 November)

Mike Bishop

• RE: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 (Thursday, 17 December)
• RE: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Monday, 14 December)
• RE: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Monday, 14 December)
• RE: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Thursday, 10 December)
• RE: For discussion: scope for AltSvc and ORIGIN bis efforts (Thursday, 5 November)
• RE: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Thursday, 5 November)
• RE: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? (Thursday, 5 November)
• RE: H2 vs responses which should not carry any payload (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: Redirections to `Content-Encoding: encrypted` payloads (Friday, 2 October)

Mike Taylor

• Re: Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism (Friday, 13 November)

Mike West

• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-07.txt (Monday, 7 December)

Mitar

• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Wednesday, 2 December)

Nick Harper

• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: Structured Fields: whitespace in binary content (Wednesday, 28 October)

Orie Steele

• Interested in working on draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures (Tuesday, 20 October)

Philippe Mougin

• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Friday, 27 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Wednesday, 18 November)

Poul-Henning Kamp

• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: Structured Fields: whitespace in binary content (Wednesday, 28 October)

Repository Activity Summary Bot

• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 27 December)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 20 December)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 13 December)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 6 December)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 29 November)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 22 November)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 15 November)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 8 November)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 1 November)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 25 October)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 18 October)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 11 October)
• Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary) (Sunday, 4 October)

RFC Errata System

• [Errata Rejected] RFC7231 (6354) (Tuesday, 15 December)
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7231 (6354) (Thursday, 10 December)
• [Errata Rejected] RFC7230 (6333) (Friday, 13 November)
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (6333) (Friday, 13 November)
• [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7233 (5620) (Friday, 13 November)
• [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7540 (6309) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• [Errata Rejected] RFC7235 (6307) (Monday, 19 October)
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7540 (6309) (Monday, 19 October)
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7235 (6307) (Thursday, 15 October)

Roberto Polli

• Re: Digest: use in requests (Tuesday, 29 December)
• Digest: use in requests (Monday, 28 December)
• Digest Headers: digest-algorithms "last call" (Monday, 28 December)
• Re: Considering RFC7725bis (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: Digests: deprecating parameters? (Wednesday, 7 October)

Robin MARX

• Re: Priority signals in HTTP/2 (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: The future of qlog (Monday, 23 November)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: Are accept-extension parameters used in practice? (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Sunday, 6 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: Structured Fields: whitespace in binary content (Thursday, 29 October)

Sawood Alam

• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? (Wednesday, 4 November)
• How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: A typo in the HTTP SEARCH method draft (Wednesday, 4 November)
• A typo in the HTTP SEARCH method draft (Wednesday, 4 November)

Sergio Garcia Murillo

• WebRTC, Ingest Signaling over HTTPS (WISH) WG charter (Monday, 7 December)

Shivan Kaul Sahib

• Re: RFC7725bis new elements (Friday, 13 November)

Soni L.

• "redirect" files? (Friday, 4 December)
• TCP and UDP over HTTP (Tuesday, 10 November)

Stefan Eissing

• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Thursday, 3 December)

Stephane Bortzmeyer

• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? (Thursday, 5 November)

Tim Bray

• Re: RFC7725bis new elements (Thursday, 12 November)
• RFC7725bis new elements (Thursday, 12 November)

Tommy Pauly

• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Saturday, 19 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Structured Fields: last-minute corrections (Monday, 5 October)

Victor Vasiliev

• Re: [TLS] ALPS and TLS 1.3 half-RTT data (Friday, 11 December)

W. Felix Handte

• Re: Redirections to `Content-Encoding: encrypted` payloads (Thursday, 1 October)

Willy Tarreau

• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 (Monday, 21 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Sunday, 20 December)
• Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2 (Saturday, 19 December)
• Re: Priority signals in HTTP/2 (Saturday, 19 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: Are accept-extension parameters used in practice? (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Call for Adoption: HTTP/2 Bis (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (6333) (Saturday, 14 November)
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (6333) (Saturday, 14 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: How to express no matching results in HTTP SEARH method? (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: Call for Adoption: SEARCH method (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: Structured Fields: whitespace in binary content (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: H2 vs responses which should not carry any payload (Sunday, 25 October)
• Re: H2 vs responses which should not carry any payload (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: H2 vs responses which should not carry any payload (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: H2 vs responses which should not carry any payload (Friday, 23 October)
• H2 vs responses which should not carry any payload (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: Optional Connection fields in 1xx messages and Upgrade requests (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: Optional Connection fields in 1xx messages and Upgrade requests (Thursday, 15 October)

Last message date: Tuesday, 29 December 2020 13:39:08 UTC