Re: Structured Fields: last-minute corrections

On Tue., 6 Oct. 2020, 03:21 Tommy Pauly, <> wrote:

> Agreed that a new draft version is not needed, and these can be applied by
> the editor (before or after AUTH48).
> The changes to the document are minor, and I believe the suggestions do
> not change the meaning or intention of the specification, but merely
> clarify.
> If there is anyone in the working group who disagrees with the suggested
> changes, please speak up!
> Best,
> Tommy

I commented on #1273, I don't understand the proposed ABNF. However I
generally agree to the approach on both issues (and am happy to ignore the
third), as long as that bit of syntax is correct.

Matthew Kerwin

Received on Monday, 5 October 2020 21:32:30 UTC