W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2020

Re: Call for Adoption: Cookie Incrementalism

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 20:47:07 +1300
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <0fa5e1c1-51ad-3ef3-8937-303f565e7912@treenet.co.nz>
On 13/11/20 12:45 pm, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Those with good memories will recall that when we started RFC6265bis, we required significant changes to the specification to be backed by a separate I-D, so that we could judge consensus and implementation support for it separately. See:
>    https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2015OctDec/0165.html
> 
> In the spirit of that, we have one more proposal for consideration:
>    https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-west-cookie-incrementalism-01
> 
> Parts of this were discussed at the recent interim:
>    https://httpwg.org/wg-materials/interim-20-10/rfc6265bis.pdf#page=3
> 
> Other parts (e.g., s 3.4-3.6) may need more discussion; if we adopt the draft, we may decide that they aren't worth pursuing, but by default we'd spend some time discussing them.
> 
> Please comment on whether you support adoption of this document into RFC6265bis. In particular, we're looking for implementer feedback because -- as before -- our goal for this effort is to be closely aligned with implementation behaviour.
> 
> The Call for Adoption will run until 27 November.
> 
> - Mark and Tommy
> 


I support adoption.


Amos
Received on Friday, 13 November 2020 07:55:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 13 November 2020 07:55:43 UTC