W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2020

Re: 0-RTT Design for HTTP/2

From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 18:16:21 +1100
Message-Id: <228aa35f-6e08-49b3-a02c-94026d3ecd04@www.fastmail.com>
To: "Willy Tarreau" <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Hi Willy,

On Mon, Dec 21, 2020, at 18:09, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Server-side settings changes are extremely unlikely, 

Good point.  I've tried to capture this in https://github.com/martinthomson/h2-0rtt/issues/2

> Just a point however, my understanding then is that EARLY_DATA_SETTINGS
> isn't properly named. The purpose is not as much to send settings using
> early data as it is to persist settings across connections. What about
> PERSISTENT_SETTINGS instead ? Use of early data here is just a byproduct
> of not having to wait for the server settings, and even requests can be
> sent over early data in this case.

I considered that, but it deliberately only says that it applies to early data.  There is a whole discussion about how this doesn't work for resumption in https://martinthomson.github.io/h2-0rtt/draft-thomson-httpbis-h2-0rtt.html#name-use-for-resumption - at least in the general case.

Received on Monday, 21 December 2020 07:16:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 21 December 2020 07:16:56 UTC