xml-dist-app@w3.org from August 2001 by author

Aleksander A Slominski

• ANN: IBM Web Services Invocation Framework posted to alphaWorks (Monday, 13 August)

Andrew Layman

• RE: Section 5 Item 9 of the SOAP spec (Thursday, 23 August)

Andy Lin

• test (Friday, 31 August)

Anish Karmarkar

• Introduction (Tuesday, 28 August)

Asir S Vedamuthu

• Value of xsi:type & anonymous simple and complex types (Monday, 6 August)
• [Clarification] Rule for serializing a simple value (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Production Rule for SOAP-ENC:arrayType (Monday, 6 August)
• Production Rule for SOAP-ENC:arrayType (Monday, 6 August)

bighooters@aol.com

• Bmw Newsletter (Monday, 6 August)

Carlos C. Tapang

• RE: Production Rule for SOAP-ENC:arrayType (Monday, 6 August)

christopher ferris

• Re: Proposed text for XMLBase (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Proposal for a protocol binding model (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: TBTF: A small Doodle of an HTTP Binding (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Proposal for a protocol binding model (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: TBTF: A small Doodle of an HTTP Binding (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: Proposal for a protocol binding model (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: TBTF: Proposal for a binding framework (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Message exchanges over multiple transports? (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Action Item : brief mustHappen analysis (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Action Item : brief mustHappen analysis (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Ref materials for XMLP telcon agenda, August 8, 2001 (LONG) (Thursday, 9 August)
• Re: RPCTF: issue #45 (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: proposed wording to address attributes (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Where's soap.xsd? (Thursday, 2 August)
• proposed wording to address attributes (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: [TBTF] Binding Context (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: [TBTF] Binding Models and the Abstract Model. (long :-( ) (Wednesday, 1 August)

Chuck Campbell

• RPCTF Exteding the Fault Code scheme (Thursday, 9 August)

Dan Brickley

• Re: Relationship between SOAP data model, SOAP encoding, and RPC (Tuesday, 14 August)

David Crowley

• Re: SOAP and the Web architecture (Tuesday, 28 August)

David Ezell

• RE: To whom it concerns (Wednesday, 1 August)

David Fallside

• Re: Location of FAQ? (Wednesday, 22 August)
• emails from the outage (Thursday, 9 August)
• RPCTF CALL TODAY (Thursday, 9 August)
• [TBTF] Binding Architecture, draft (Tuesday, 7 August)

David Orchard

• RE: SOAP and the Web architecture (Tuesday, 28 August)
• RE: SOAP and the Web architecture (Tuesday, 28 August)
• RE: SOAP and the Web architecture (Tuesday, 28 August)
• RE: SOAP and the Web architecture (Friday, 24 August)
• RE: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 (Friday, 17 August)
• RE: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 (Thursday, 16 August)
• RE: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 (Thursday, 16 August)
• RE: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 (Thursday, 16 August)

Dick Brooks

• RE: SOAP and the Web architecture (Saturday, 25 August)

Doug Davis

• SOAPAction Proposal (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Re: RPC issue: multiple body blocks (Saturday, 18 August)
• RE: RPC issue: multiple body blocks (Saturday, 18 August)
• Re: RPC issue: multiple body blocks (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Thursday, 2 August)

elke.e.meier@daimlerchrysler.com

• Antwort: Proposal for naming the SOAP RPC return value (Monday, 20 August)

Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine

• Re: PROVREG and XML Protocol (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: PROVREG and XML Protocol (Thursday, 16 August)

Eric Jenkins

• resent: Issue 107: Application def'n (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Issue 107: Application def'n (Tuesday, 7 August)

Eugene Kuznetsov

• RE: SOAP and the Web architecture (Monday, 27 August)

Francis Norton

• Re: SOAP and the Web architecture (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: SOAP and the Web architecture (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: Cookies (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: Cookies (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: POST abuse? (Sunday, 26 August)

Frank DeRose

• Section 5 Item 9 of the SOAP spec (Wednesday, 22 August)
• RE: RPC issue: multiple body blocks (Saturday, 18 August)
• RE: RPC issue: multiple body blocks (Friday, 17 August)
• RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Wednesday, 8 August)

Glen Daniels

• RE: Action Item : brief mustHappen analysis (Wednesday, 15 August)
• RE: Action Item : brief mustHappen analysis (Wednesday, 15 August)
• RE: Action Item : brief mustHappen analysis (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Action Item : brief mustHappen analysis (Wednesday, 15 August)
• RE: [TBTF] Binding Context (Wednesday, 1 August)

graham glass

• RE: [soapbuilders] Proposal for naming the SOAP RPC return value (Friday, 17 August)

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

• RE: Issue 71: Additional actors (Saturday, 1 September)
• RE: Issue 71: Additional actors (Friday, 31 August)
• RE: Issue 71: Additional actors (Friday, 31 August)
• RE: TBTF: A small Doodle of an HTTP Binding (Monday, 20 August)
• RE: RPC issue: multiple body blocks (Monday, 20 August)
• RE: TBTF: A small Doodle of an HTTP Binding (Friday, 17 August)
• RE: Proposal for a protocol binding model (Friday, 17 August)
• RE: Proposed replacement text for final paragraph in Section 3 (Friday, 17 August)
• Proposal for a protocol binding model (Thursday, 16 August)
• RPC-TF status update Aug 15 2001 (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Relationship between SOAP data model, SOAP encoding, and RPC (Tuesday, 14 August)
• RE: mustUnderstand reformulation (Monday, 6 August)
• RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Monday, 6 August)
• RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Monday, 6 August)

Herve Ruellan

• Re: Fault code .extension mechanism (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: proposed wording to address attributes (Thursday, 2 August)

Hollenbeck, Scott

• RE: PROVREG and XML Protocol (Thursday, 16 August)

Hugo Haas

• Re: Issue 71: Additional actors (Friday, 31 August)
• Resolution of issue 118 (and of 24, 100, 109, 111, 115, 123) (Thursday, 30 August)
• Proposed text for closure of issue 45 (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Proposed text for XMLBase (Thursday, 30 August)
• Set of minutes available (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Re: SOAP and the Web architecture (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: SOAP and the Web architecture (Monday, 27 August)
• Scan of comments sent to xmlp-comments: new issues (Friday, 24 August)
• SOAP and the Web architecture (Thursday, 23 August)
• Minutes of the August 15 teleconference (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: discarding incorrect namespaces (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Proposal for a protocol binding model (Thursday, 16 August)
• Minutes of the August 8 teleconference (Wednesday, 15 August)
• TBTF: Binding First Cut for Review 8/13 (Monday, 13 August)

Jacek Kopecky

• RE: Proposal for naming the SOAP RPC return value (Friday, 17 August)
• Proposal for naming the SOAP RPC return value (Friday, 17 August)
• RE: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 (Friday, 17 August)
• soapbuilders' feedback to SOAP RPC response issues (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: mustUnderstand reformulation (Thursday, 16 August)
• encodings in RPC (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Relationship between SOAP data model, SOAP encoding, and RPC (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: issues with SOAP RPC responses (link to soapbuilders) (Tuesday, 14 August)
• issues with SOAP RPC responses (link to soapbuilders) (Tuesday, 14 August)
• RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Thursday, 9 August)
• RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Monday, 6 August)
• RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Monday, 6 August)
• RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Monday, 6 August)
• issue #45 proposed resolution (Monday, 6 August)
• RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Monday, 6 August)
• RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Sunday, 5 August)
• RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Sunday, 5 August)
• RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Sunday, 5 August)
• RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Toss section 5 (create SOAP-lite) (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Thursday, 2 August)
• RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Thursday, 2 August)
• RPCTF: issue #45 (Thursday, 2 August)
• Fault code .extension mechanism (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Wednesday, 1 August)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

• RPC procedure error issue (Monday, 27 August)

Jeff Bone

• Re: SOAP and the Web architecture (Wednesday, 29 August)

Jones, Matthew

• RE: SOAP and the Web architecture (Monday, 27 August)
• Does SOAP have IDL (Monday, 27 August)
• RE: SOAP and the Web architecture (Monday, 27 August)
• RE: SOAP and the Web architecture (Monday, 27 August)
• RE: SOAP and the Web architecture (Monday, 27 August)
• RE: Cookies (Monday, 27 August)

Kurt Cagle

• Re: SOAP and the Web architecture (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: POST abuse? (Sunday, 26 August)

Laird A Popkin

• Re: POST abuse? (Sunday, 26 August)

Laird Nelson

• RE: SOAP and the Web architecture (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: SOAP and the Web architecture (Monday, 27 August)
• Location of FAQ? (Wednesday, 22 August)

Larry Masinter

• RE: SOAP and the Web architecture (Wednesday, 29 August)
• RE: SOAP and the Web architecture (Wednesday, 29 August)
• RE: SOAP and the Web architecture (Saturday, 25 August)

Marc Hadley

• Re: Canonical representation of boolean attributes (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: mustUnderstand reformulation (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Thursday, 9 August)
• Re: mustUnderstand reformulation (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: mustUnderstand reformulation (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related no tions of identity. (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related no tions of identity. (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related n otions of identity. (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related notions of identity. (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related notions of identity. (Monday, 6 August)

mario.jeckle@daimlerchrysler.com

• Canonical representation of boolean attributes (Wednesday, 15 August)

Mark Baker

• Re: SOAP and the Web architecture (Saturday, 25 August)
• Re: SOAP and the Web architecture (Saturday, 25 August)
• Re: SOAP and the Web architecture (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: SOAP and the Web architecture (Friday, 24 August)
• Announcing RESTwiki (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Proposal for a protocol binding model (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Proposal for a protocol binding model (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Proposal for a protocol binding model (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Proposal for a protocol binding model (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Proposal for a protocol binding model (Tuesday, 21 August)

Mark Jones

• RE: Issue 71: Additional actors (Friday, 31 August)

Mark Nottingham

• Issue 71: Additional actors (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: SOAPAction Proposal (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Re: SOAP and the Web architecture (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: SOAP and the Web architecture (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: SOAP and the Web architecture (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: SOAP and the Web architecture (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: SOAP Response Caching (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: SOAP and the Web architecture (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: SOAP and the Web architecture (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: POST abuse? (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: POST abuse? (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: POST abuse? (Saturday, 25 August)
• Re: SOAP and the Web architecture (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: SOAP and the Web architecture (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: discarding incorrect namespaces (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Proposal for a protocol binding model (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Proposal for a protocol binding model (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: RPC issue: multiple body blocks (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: RPC issue: multiple body blocks (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: RPC issue: multiple body blocks (Friday, 17 August)
• discarding incorrect namespaces (Friday, 17 August)
• RPC issue: multiple body blocks (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: TBTF: Proposal for a binding framework (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: PROVREG and XML Protocol (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: PROVREG and XML Protocol (Thursday, 16 August)
• PROVREG and XML Protocol (Wednesday, 15 August)

Martin Gudgin

• Re: I miss the fault-element (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Proposed replacement text for final paragraph in Section 3 (Friday, 17 August)
• Proposed replacement text for final paragraph in Section 3 (Thursday, 16 August)

Matt Long

• RE: Relationship between SOAP data model, SOAP encoding, and RPC (Wednesday, 15 August)
• RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Thursday, 9 August)
• RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Monday, 6 August)
• RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Saturday, 4 August)
• RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Saturday, 4 August)
• RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Thursday, 2 August)
• RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Wednesday, 1 August)

Michael Brennan

• RE: Proposal for naming the SOAP RPC return value (Friday, 17 August)

Miles Sabin

• Message exchanges over multiple transports? (Thursday, 16 August)

Mountain, Highland M

• TBTF: SMTP Request/Response Sample Binding Schematic Description (Thursday, 16 August)

Nilo Mitra (EMX)

• RE: mustUnderstand reformulation (Tuesday, 7 August)
• RE: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related no tions of identity. (Tuesday, 7 August)
• RE: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related no tions of identity. (Monday, 6 August)

Nina Thayer

• To whom it concerns (Wednesday, 1 August)

Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com

• Proposed text for XMLBase (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Re: encodings in RPC (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: PROVREG and XML Protocol (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: TBTF: A small Doodle of an HTTP Binding (Friday, 17 August)
• Re: Proposed replacement text for final paragraph in Section 3 (Thursday, 16 August)
• RE: Action Item : brief mustHappen analysis (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Action Item : brief mustHappen analysis (Wednesday, 15 August)
• RE: mustUnderstand reformulation (Saturday, 11 August)
• RE: mustUnderstand reformulation (Saturday, 11 August)
• Re: mustUnderstand reformulation (Saturday, 11 August)
• mustUnderstand reformulation (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related n otions of identity. (Monday, 6 August)
• RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Monday, 6 August)
• RE: Proposed resolution: issues 78, 16 (Saturday, 4 August)
• Re: Draft of Diagram from Protocols Binding Task Force (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Draft of Diagram from Protocols Binding Task Force (Thursday, 2 August)
• Draft of Diagram from Protocols Binding Task Force (Thursday, 2 August)

Paul Cotton

• RE: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 (Thursday, 16 August)
• RE: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 (Thursday, 16 August)
• RE: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 (Thursday, 16 August)
• RE: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 (Thursday, 16 August)
• RE: Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 (Thursday, 16 August)
• RE: Proposed Primer ToC (Thursday, 16 August)
• Issue 30: Action item 2001/06/20 (Wednesday, 15 August)

Paul Prescod

• Re: SOAP and the Web architecture (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: SOAP and the Web architecture (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: SOAP and the Web architecture (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: SOAP and the Web architecture (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: SOAP and the Web architecture (Monday, 27 August)
• Cookies (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: POST abuse? (Sunday, 26 August)
• Re: POST abuse? (Sunday, 26 August)
• POST abuse? (Saturday, 25 August)

Rich Salz

• Re: Proposed text for closure of issue 45 (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Does SOAP have IDL (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: SOAP and the Web architecture (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: soapbuilders' feedback to SOAP RPC response issues (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Action Item : brief mustHappen analysis (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Action Item : brief mustHappen analysis (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Re: Production Rule for SOAP-ENC:arrayType (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Production Rule for SOAP-ENC:arrayType (Monday, 6 August)

Richard Shockey

• Re: PROVREG and XML Protocol (Thursday, 16 August)

Rick H Wesson

• Re: PROVREG and XML Protocol (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: PROVREG and XML Protocol (Thursday, 16 August)

Roger L. Costello

• Where's soap.xsd? (Wednesday, 1 August)

Scott Cantor

• RE: SOAP and the Web architecture (Tuesday, 28 August)
• RE: SOAP and the Web architecture (Tuesday, 28 August)

Simon Fell

• Re: soapbuilders' feedback to SOAP RPC response issues (Thursday, 16 August)

Stefan Haustein

• Re: [soapbuilders] Proposal for naming the SOAP RPC return value (Monday, 20 August)

tkir@techem.de

• Re: I miss the fault-element (Thursday, 30 August)
• I miss the fault-element (Thursday, 30 August)

Williams, Stuart

• RE: Proposed text for XMLBase (Thursday, 30 August)
• RE: TBTF: A small Doodle of an HTTP Binding (Friday, 17 August)
• TBTF: A small Doodle of an HTTP Binding (Friday, 17 August)
• RPCTF: Supplementary Quesstion/Issue on Issue 16 (void returns) (Friday, 10 August)
• RE: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related no tions of identity. (Tuesday, 7 August)
• RPCTF: Supplementary Quesstion/Issue on Issue 16 (void returns) (Wednesday, 8 August)
• RE: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related n otions of identity. (Monday, 6 August)
• RE: [TBTF] Binding Models and the Abstract Model. (long :-( ) (Friday, 3 August)
• RE: [TBTF] Binding Context (Friday, 3 August)
• RE: [TBTF] Binding Context (Wednesday, 1 August)
• [TBTF] Binding Models and the Abstract Model. (long :-( ) (Wednesday, 1 August)

Yves Lafon

• Re: POST abuse? (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: POST abuse? (Monday, 27 August)
• RPC TF telcon minutes - 6 aug 2001 (Monday, 13 August)
• Minutes of july 25 teleconference (Wednesday, 1 August)

Zhanna Osna

• To whom it may concern (Wednesday, 1 August)

Last message date: Friday, 31 August 2001 20:21:59 UTC