Francis Norton wrote: > > ... > > This seems a reasonable analysis of the current situation to me - but a > more satisfactory alternative to this situation would be to define an > official session key storage element in the SOAP header section. I think > that this might satisfy an immediate and important user requirement, > before less satisfactory solutions get frozen into de-facto standards. Can you please clarify the requirement for cookies? A cookie is extra information that is passed along with a request. A SOAP message uses an extensible syntax designed to transmit arbitrarily complex information. a) Why would you need to put the cookie in a header. b) What is the benefit in having a *standardized* cookie syntax rather than transmitting the same information as a random XML element in your favorite XML namespace. myns:mycookie Or even better, you could just transmit the information represented by the cookie explicitly (e.g. your customer id, your authentication information, etc.). -- Take a recipe. Leave a recipe. Python Cookbook! http://www.ActiveState.com/pythoncookbookReceived on Monday, 27 August 2001 04:28:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:03 GMT