W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > August 2001

Re: Proposal for a protocol binding model

From: christopher ferris <chris.ferris@east.sun.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 20:19:19 -0400
Message-ID: <3B7C6307.C587EE7F@east.sun.com>
To: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
CC: xml-dist-app@w3.org
I think that this might be a good approach.

Cheers,

Chris

Hugo Haas wrote:
> 
> * Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com> [2001-08-16 11:59-0700]
> >                        Proposal for a Binding Framework
> [..]
> 
> You consider a combination of bindings (e.g. SMTP+RPC) as a new
> binding requiring a new identifier.
> 
> Once people have come up with lots of different nested bindings
> (attachments, RPC, maybe compression, etc), the number of combinations
> will be fairly high, and a URI for each of them might become
> unworkable.
> 
> Presumably, the binding (and unbinding) of the SOAP message will have
> to be an ordered operation: e.g. XML Infoset -> XML serialization ->
> MIME multipart -> SMTP.
> 
> What about an ordered list of URIs for a combination of bindings?
> 
> --
> Hugo Haas - W3C
> mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/ - tel:+1-617-452-2092
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2001 20:20:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:03 GMT