Re: Proposal for a protocol binding model

* Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com> [2001-08-16 11:59-0700]
>                        Proposal for a Binding Framework
[..]

You consider a combination of bindings (e.g. SMTP+RPC) as a new
binding requiring a new identifier.

Once people have come up with lots of different nested bindings
(attachments, RPC, maybe compression, etc), the number of combinations
will be fairly high, and a URI for each of them might become
unworkable.

Presumably, the binding (and unbinding) of the SOAP message will have
to be an ordered operation: e.g. XML Infoset -> XML serialization ->
MIME multipart -> SMTP.

What about an ordered list of URIs for a combination of bindings?

-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/ - tel:+1-617-452-2092

Received on Thursday, 16 August 2001 16:23:57 UTC