Marc, Stuart: Please see an amended proposal inlined below. Nilo > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Marc Hadley [mailto:marc.hadley@sun.com] > > Sent: 06 August 2001 12:35 > > To: Marc Hadley > > Cc: Eric Jenkins; 'xml-dist-app@w3.org' > > Subject: Re: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, > actor & related > > notions of identity. > > > > > > As a result of some private discussion I'd like to offer > the following > > small change to my original proposal for reworking 4.2.2 and 4.2.3. > > > > Replace: "The special URI > > "http://www.w3.org/2001/06/soap-envelope/actor/next" > indicates that the > > SOAP header block is intended for the very first SOAP node that > > processes the message." > > > > With: "The special URI > > "http://www.w3.org/2001/06/soap-envelope/actor/next" > > indicates that the SOAP header block is intended for the next SOAP > > node in the SOAP message path." > > Not sure... feels like "tomorrow never comes". Your suggested revision > captures the meaning of ".../next" on transmission from the a > node/actor/application/processor, but not receipt at a > node/actor/application/processor. How about the following (with additions in CAPITALS) to take care of the concern from a receiver's point of view: "The special URI "http://www.w3.org/2001/06/soap-envelope/actor/next" indicates that the SOAP header block is intended for the next SOAP node in the SOAP message path OR THE CURRENT SOAP RECEIVER, IN THE CASE WHEN SUCH A HEADER BLOCK IS RECEIVED AT A SOAP NODE."Received on Monday, 6 August 2001 16:05:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:03 GMT