W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > August 2001

Re: soapbuilders' feedback to SOAP RPC response issues

From: Simon Fell <soap@zaks.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:51:18 -0700
To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-id: <71nontom8sv3j03le4oihsg0os4inlq7lu@4ax.com>
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 14:43:08 -0400, in soap you wrote:

>My recollection is that there was no clear consensus.
>
>> 3. static: "SOAP-RPC-Return-Value"
>
>Presumably namespace qualified?

Doesn't attempting to NS qualify #3 make it an exception to the normal
section 5 rules for accessors ?

>I like #2, re-using the containing struct name.  One less magic name to
>consider.
>
>	/r$

I know i'm somewhat late to the discussion, but i'd prefer #1 or #2
over #3. 

Cheers
Simon
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2001 19:51:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:03 GMT