Re: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related no tions of identity.

Nilo Mitra (EMX) wrote:
> I prefer the first, too, but should we drop the "/Node", and simply call 
> it SOAP receiver, as a SOAP receiver is also a SOAP node.
> 
+1.

Regards,
Marc.

>  > -----Original Message-----
>  > From: Marc Hadley [mailto:marc.hadley@sun.com]
>  > Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 7:46 AM
>  > To: Williams, Stuart
>  > Cc: 'Nilo Mitra (EMX)'; 'xml-dist-app@w3.org'
>  > Subject: Re: Issue 107: Clarify the terms application, actor & related
>  > no tions of identity.
>  >
>  >
>  > Williams, Stuart wrote:
>  > > Nilo,
>  > >
>  > > What you suggest is fine, although I think
>  > > that one single-ended definition from the point of view of
>  > either SOAP
>  > > Receiver or a SOAP Sender would be better:
>  > >
>  > > ie.
>  > >
>  > > "At a SOAP Receiver the special URI
>  > > "http://www.w3.org/2001/06/soap-envelope/actor/next"
>  > indicates that the
>  > > SOAP Header block is targetted at the current SOAP Receiver/Node."
>  > >
>  > > OR
>  > >
>  > > "At a SOAP Sender the special URI
>  > > "http://www.w3.org/2001/06/soap-envelope/actor/next"
>  > indicates that the
>  > > SOAP Header block is targetted at the next SOAP
>  > Receiver/Node along the
>  > > SOAP Message Path".
>  > >
>  > > The first avoids the need to mention message path, while
>  > the second is
>  > > very close to Marc's original. Either would be ok... take your pick!
>  > >
>  > I prefer the former, it's clearer.
>  >
>  > Regards,
>  > Marc.
>  >
>  > --
>  > Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
>  > Tel: +44 1252 423740
>  > Int: x23740
>  >
>  >
> 

--
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
Tel: +44 1252 423740
Int: x23740