www-validator@w3.org from October 2002 by date

Friday, 1 November 2002

• Re: Validation of multiple ID tags Bjoern Hoehrmann

Thursday, 31 October 2002

• checklink: Roger Bjoregren
• Re: Beta: Charset attribute Karl Ove Hufthammer
• Validation of multiple ID tags Jones, Stephen JG
• Re: bug in checklink Jean Delvare

Friday, 1 November 2002

• Re: Beta: Validate URI... Olivier Thereaux

Thursday, 31 October 2002

• Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified! Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified! Ian Hickson
• Re: Beta: XHTML 1.0 in XML Schema Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified! Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Beta: Validate URI... Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Beta: Validate URI... Einar Westermann
• Beta: Charset attribute Einar Westermann
• Re: bug in checklink Lloyd Wood
• Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified! Ian Hickson
• Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified! Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified! Ian Hickson
• Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified! Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Two suggestions Klaus Johannes Rusch
• Re: bug in checklink Olivier Thereaux
• Re: Beta: outline feature broken Frederic Schutz
• detailed.html page broken in CVS Frederic Schutz

Wednesday, 30 October 2002

• bug in checklink Jean Delvare
• Re: Two suggestions Craig Macbride

Thursday, 31 October 2002

• Re: Validation bug Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: XHTML 1.0 in XML Schema Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: Add Site Tools Olivier Thereaux

Wednesday, 30 October 2002

• Re: Beta: XML caveats disappeared Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified! Terje Bless
• Re: Error X. Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Beta: Doctype override and valid documents Terje Bless
• 403 permission error w/ validator Terje Bless
• Re: Validation bug Kim Brooks Wei
• Re: MathML validation Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Beta: XHTML 1.0 in XML Schema Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: MathML validation Nick Kew

Tuesday, 29 October 2002

• Re: Beta: XML Output Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Two suggestions Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Validation bug Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Beta: XML Output Bjoern Hoehrmann
• MathML validation Robert Miner
• Error X. Johnathan Castle
• Re: Beta: XML Output Terje Bless
• Re: Two suggestions Lloyd Wood
• Re: Two suggestions Klaus Johannes Rusch
• Re: Beta: XML Output Ian Hickson
• Re: Beta: XML Output Jim Ley
• Re: Beta: XML Output Terje Bless
• Re: Beta W3C HTML validator Ville Skyttä

Monday, 28 October 2002

• Validation bug Kim Brooks Wei
• Two suggestions Craig Macbride
• Re: Beta: XML Output Karl Dubost
• Re: Beta: outline feature broken Ville Skyttä
• Re: Beta: XML Output Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: XML Output Gannon J. Dick
• Re: Beta: XML Output Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Beta: XML Output Karl Dubost
• Re: Beta: outline feature broken Lloyd Wood
• Re: Beta: outline feature broken Gannon J. Dick
• Re: Beta: outline feature broken Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Beta: XHTML 1.0 in XML Schema Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: Beta: outline feature broken Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: XHTML 1.0 in XML Schema Terje Bless
• Re: Public beta test of the W3C Markup Validator Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: outline feature broken Olivier Thereaux

Sunday, 27 October 2002

• Beta W3C HTML validator Sitsofe Wheeler
• Fwd: [svg-developers] W3C: validate your SVGs online (beta) Chris Lilley
• Re: Beta: XHTML 1.0 in XML Schema Tim Bagot
• Re: Default encoding for new validator Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Beta: pre in place of code for icon code Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Beta: Validator does not escape & Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: checklink: verbose screeens even when not wanted Ville Skyttä
• Beta: Validator does not remove fragment identifier Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Beta: Validator does not properly escape URIs Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Beta: outline feature broken Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Beta: XHTML 1.0 in XML Schema Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Public beta test of the W3C Markup Validator Bjoern Hoehrmann

Saturday, 26 October 2002

• undetected error -- or not John Russell

Sunday, 27 October 2002

• Re: undetected error -- or not Terje Bless

Saturday, 26 October 2002

• Re: Beta: OpenSP vs. -R Liam Quinn
• Re: Beta: xml-stylesheet and xml:lang Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: parse_errors must not split at : Nick Kew
• Re: Beta: parse_errors must not split at : Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Beta: parse_errors must not split at : Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: OpenSP vs. -R Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: config file references Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: /check/ breaks links Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: missing </div> in doctype error Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: Self check points at wrong validator Terje Bless
• Re: bug in validator output (or parsing?) Terje Bless
• Re: Public beta test of the W3C Markup Validator Terje Bless
• Re: Default encoding for new validator Terje Bless
• Re: <A target="_blank"> bug? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Beta: OpenSP vs. -R Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Beta: parse_errors must not split at : Bjoern Hoehrmann
• <A target="_blank"> bug? Ian Thomas
• Beta: config file references Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Beta: /check/ breaks links Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Beta: missing </div> in doctype error Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Beta: Self check points at wrong validator Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Question Christoph Päper

Friday, 25 October 2002

• Question Jim A. Bush
• bug in validator output (or parsing?) Krishna `Shamu' Sethuraman

Saturday, 26 October 2002

• Re: Public beta test of the W3C Markup Validator Martin Duerst
• Default encoding for new validator Christopher R. Maden

Friday, 25 October 2002

• Re: Public beta test of the W3C Markup Validator Martin Duerst
• Re: DTDs - not a fixed set Terje Bless
• Re: DTDs - not a fixed set Liam Quinn
• Re: DTDs - not a fixed set Nick Kew
• Re: Beta: xml-stylesheet and xml:lang Ville Skyttä
• Re: Beta: xml-stylesheet and xml:lang Bertilo Wennergren
• Re: Beta: xml-stylesheet and xml:lang Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Beta: xml-stylesheet and xml:lang Terje Bless
• Re: Content Negotiation and Minor Nitpicking Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: xml-stylesheet and xml:lang Bertilo Wennergren
• Re: Beta: xml-stylesheet and xml:lang Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Beta: xml-stylesheet and xml:lang Terje Bless
• Re: Public beta test of the W3C Markup Validator Gannon J. Dick
• Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified! Terje Bless
• Beta: xml-stylesheet and xml:lang Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Content Negotiation and Minor Nitpicking Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified! Liam Quinn
• Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified! Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified! Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Beta: form mis-use Ville Skyttä
• Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified! Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified! Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Public beta test of the W3C Markup Validator Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified! Bertilo Wennergren
• Re: Public beta test of the W3C Markup Validator Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified! Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified! Liam Quinn
• Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified! Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: form mis-use Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified! Terje Bless
• Beta: form mis-use Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified! Terje Bless
• Re: DTDs - not a fixed set Jim Ley
• Re: DTDs - not a fixed set Chris Lilley
• Re: Users guide is out of date Terje Bless
• Re: DTDs - not a fixed set Terje Bless
• Re: Incorrect SVG mime type on whats new page Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified! Eric Meyer
• Re: w3.org Validity (was: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified!) Jim Ley
• Re: w3.org Validity (was: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified!) Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]
• Re: Incorrect SVG mime type on whats new page Jim Ley
• Users guide is out of date Chris Lilley
• Re: w3.org Validity (was: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified!) Karl Dubost
• Re: w3.org Validity (was: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified!) Karl Dubost
• Re: w3.org Validity (was: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified!) Olivier Thereaux
• DTDs - not a fixed set Chris Lilley
• Re: Public beta test of the W3C Markup Validator Jim Ley
• Incorrect SVG mime type on whats new page Chris Lilley
• Re: Beta validator: Document not validated with custom DTD Klaus Johannes Rusch
• Re: Public beta test of the W3C Markup Validator Chris Lilley
• Re: w3.org Validity (was: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified!) Jim Ley
• Re: w3.org Validity (was: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified!) Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP]
• Re: Public beta test of the W3C Markup Validator Martin Duerst
• w3.org Validity (was: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified!) Dominique Hazaël-Massieux
• Re: Beta: Doctype override and valid documents Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified! Jim Ley
• Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified! Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Beta: file name extensions Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Public beta test of the W3C Markup Validator Chris Lilley
• Re: HTML validator indicates false positives? Ian Hickson
• Re: Public beta test of the W3C Markup Validator Martin Duerst
• Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified! Bertilo Wennergren
• Re: Beta: XML caveats disappeared Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: Add Site Tools Olivier Thereaux
• Re: SVG MIME type Terje Bless
• Re: config file missing error message Terje Bless

Thursday, 24 October 2002

• Re: Beta: XML caveats disappeared Terje Bless

Friday, 25 October 2002

• Re: Beta: Add Site Tools Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: Revalidate button Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified! Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: Doctype override and valid documents Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: Links to advanced results Terje Bless
• Re: Beta validator: Document not validated with custom DTD Terje Bless
• Re: Content Negotiation and Minor Nitpicking Terje Bless
• Re: Public beta test of the Markup Validator - css display issue Terje Bless
• Re: Over-eager detection of XHTML Terje Bless
• Re: HTML validator indicates false positives? Terje Bless

Thursday, 24 October 2002

• HTML validator indicates false positives? nex@o-slash.org
• Re: [beta] suggestions Terje Bless
• Re: [beta] suggestions Karl Dubost
• Re: [beta] suggestions Terje Bless
• Re: [beta] suggestions Terje Bless
• Re: Ampersands in URLs: Validator conflicts with RFC2396? Lloyd Wood
• Re: checklink: warning on shtml file Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Public beta test of the W3C Markup Validator Chris Lilley
• checklink: verbose screeens even when not wanted John Russell
• checklink: warning on shtml file John Russell
• Beta validator: Document not validated with custom DTD Klaus Johannes Rusch
• RE: Works now - upload gives different error Ralf Hauser
• Works now - please enhance the CSS Validator tool with more and meaningful error messages! Ralf Hauser
• Re: suggestion to start a bugzilla database for the validator* services Olivier Thereaux
• RE: the file of the URL below validates properly as xhtml1.1, the CSS as well, but clicking on the "check for validity" of CSS validator result page fails Ralf Hauser
• Solution for <<img align="middle" in 'xhtml 1.0 strict'>> and suggestion to start a bugzilla database for the validator* services hyperlinked verbose error messages Ralf Hauser
• Re: Apparent error in beta HTML validator function Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: the file of the URL below validates properly as xhtml1.1, the CSS as well, but clicking on the "check for validity" of CSS validator result page fails Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Public beta test of the Markup Validator - css display issue sasha
• Re: how to do img align="middle" in 'xhtml 1.0 strict' or ' xhtml1.1' Ian Hickson
• Re: Ampersands in URLs: Validator conflicts with RFC2396? Ian Hickson

Wednesday, 23 October 2002

• Apparent error in beta HTML validator function don.seeley@abbott.com
• Ampersands in URLs: Validator conflicts with RFC2396? Maarten de Boer
• config file missing error message James Dingwall
• how to do img align="middle" in 'xhtml 1.0 strict' or ' xhtml1.1' Ralf Hauser
• Re: Beta: file name extensions Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: XHTML 1.1 / XHTML Basic 1.0 Terje Bless
• Re: Beta: XHTML 1.1 / XHTML Basic 1.0 Terje Bless
• W3C: validate your SVGs online (beta) Tobias Reif
• SVG MIME type Niklas Gustavsson
• Over-eager detection of XHTML Ian Hickson
• Re: Media type Terje Bless
• [beta] suggestions Karl Dubost
• Re: Public beta test of the W3C Markup Validator Ville Skyttä
• Re: Beta: file name extensions + 403 permission error w/ validator Sean Henderson
• Content Negotiation and Minor Nitpicking Christoph Päper
• Re: Public beta test of the W3C Markup Validator Chris Lilley
• Beta: XML caveats disappeared Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Media type Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified! Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Beta: Revalidate button Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Beta: XHTML 1.1 / XHTML Basic 1.0 Bertilo Wennergren
• Beta: Doctype override and valid documents Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Beta: Links to advanced results Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Beta: file name extensions Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Beta: Add Site Tools Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Beta: XHTML 1.1 / XHTML Basic 1.0 Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: HTML 4.0 Transitional document validates as strict Max Froumentin
• HTML 4.0 Transitional document validates as strict Max Froumentin
• Media type Bertilo Wennergren
• Re: Public beta test of the Markup Validator Lachlan Cannon
• Re: Public beta test of the W3C Markup Validator Terje Bless

Tuesday, 22 October 2002

• Re: Public beta test of the Markup Validator Olivier Thereaux
• Re: Public beta test of the W3C Markup Validator Chris Lilley
• Public beta test of the Markup Validator Olivier Thereaux
• RE: desired feature for validator danielh@crosslink.net
• RE: desired feature for validator Ian Anderson
• Re: desired feature for validator Bjoern Hoehrmann
• desired feature for validator Real Name

Monday, 21 October 2002

• Re: XHTML attribute bug? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: id attribute in style tag Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Is '=' valid in <a> href attributes? Liam Quinn

Sunday, 20 October 2002

• XHTML attribute bug? Walter Baranger
• Is '=' valid in <a> href attributes? Anand Kumria

Saturday, 19 October 2002

• id attribute in style tag Rob McMeekin

Sunday, 20 October 2002

• TAKE NOTE: the SOLUTION in English/Portuguese translations 20/10/2002 10:26:28 Technical Translations

Saturday, 19 October 2002

• Re: a small bug(?) in validator ("method" must be "get" or "post", not "GET") Bjoern Hoehrmann

Friday, 18 October 2002

• vh40gif tpstudent1hotmail
• a small bug(?) in validator ("method" must be "get" or "post", not "GET") Sergii Laskavyi (1024D/CF017E57)
• Re: [Bug] the HTML validator doesn't handle the Content-Encoding header Dominique Hazaël-Massieux

Thursday, 17 October 2002

• Re: [Bug] the HTML validator doesn't handle the Content-Encoding header Terje Bless
• Re: [Bug] the HTML validator doesn't handle the Content-Encoding header Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [Bug] the HTML validator doesn't handle the Content-Encoding header Terje Bless
• Re: problems with google links (and other links) Thanasis Kinias
• Re: problems with google links (and other links) Bjoern Hoehrmann
• [Bug] the HTML validator doesn't handle the Content-Encoding header Dominique Hazaël-Massieux
• Re: possible missing '>' bug in HTML 4 validator Rich Franzen
• Re: possible missing '>' bug in HTML 4 validator Liam Quinn
• problems with google links (and other links) cesar martin.iworkwithyou
• possible missing '>' bug in HTML 4 validator Rich Franzen

Monday, 14 October 2002

• Re: Bug report Christoph Schneegans

Sunday, 13 October 2002

• Buttons not working? Mikel L. Forcada Zubizarreta

Monday, 14 October 2002

• Bug report Mikko Paltamaa

Saturday, 12 October 2002

• Re: Support UTF-16 in validators Martin Duerst

Friday, 11 October 2002

• Re: Support UTF-16 in validators Martin Duerst
• Re: Which parser does the development version use ? Liam Quinn
• Re: Which parser does the development version use ? Ville Skyttä
• Re: checklink: problems installing checklink.pl, Time::HiRes.pmerror Don Brutzman
• Which parser does the development version use ? Frederic Schutz
• Support UTF-16 in validators Niklas Dougherty

Wednesday, 9 October 2002

• Re: checklink: 406 errors Ville Skyttä
• Re: Configuration file for the development version ? Ville Skyttä
• Re: checklink: 406 errors Martin Duerst
• Re: Configuration file for the development version ? Frederic Schutz

Tuesday, 8 October 2002

• checklink: Adam Jack

Monday, 7 October 2002

• Configuration file for the development version ? Frederic Schutz

Tuesday, 8 October 2002

• Re: checklink: 406 errors Ville Skyttä
• checklink: 406 errors John Russell

Monday, 7 October 2002

• Re: checklink: option to suppress msg Bjoern Hoehrmann
• checklink: option to suppress msg John Russell

Saturday, 5 October 2002

• Re: Multiple cross-site-scripting bugs Ville Skyttä
• Re: Validator and XML namespaces David Emmerson
• Re: Validator and XML namespaces Tim Bagot
• Validator and XML namespaces Miles Elam

Friday, 4 October 2002

• ipv6 support would be nice David Fries
• Re: Fault in icon code Ville Skyttä
• Fault in icon code Per Erlandsson
• Re: Multiple cross-site-scripting bugs Olivier Thereaux
• Frame validation Importpartsplace.com

Thursday, 3 October 2002

• Re: checklink: problems installing checklink.pl, Time::HiRes.pm error Ville Skyttä
• HTML Validator Question Kevin.MacNeil@CSE-CST.GC.CA
• checklink: problems installing checklink.pl, Time::HiRes.pm error Don Brutzman

Tuesday, 1 October 2002

• Re: Validator fails horribly on ill-formed XMLDecls Martin Duerst

Last message date: Thursday, 31 October 2002 21:20:52 UTC