- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 20:43:33 +0200
- To: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
- cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: >* Terje Bless wrote: >>[using lang and xml:lang] >>[...] Can you think of any [reasons] against including it? > >[No.] Ok. I've changed it in current CVS. It will be in the next update. >>Ain't I a stinker? :-) > >No, but maybe on estrogen. Quite possibly. Exploring your feminine side, and all that. :-) Thanks for the help with this, Björn! -- I have to admit that I'm hoping the current situation with regard to XML Namespaces and W3C XML Schemas is a giant practical joke, but I see no signs of pranksters coming forward with a gleeful smile to announce that they were just kidding. -- Simon St.Laurent
Received on Friday, 25 October 2002 14:43:38 UTC