- From: Lloyd Wood <l.wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:20:58 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, <www-validator@w3.org>
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Olivier Thereaux wrote: > On Sun, Oct 27, 2002, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > > > http://validator.w3.org:8001/check?uri=http://www.w3.org;outline=1 is > > said to give an outline of the document but it does not. > > This was one of the big pre-beta questions among developers. > Some said it was better if the requested feature (outline, source, etc) > was there regardless of the result, others thought it was better to > leave "details" out if the document is valid. This is a usability no-brainer. If it's specifically requested with outline=1 it should be shown. (Only if it's not requested do you have the latitude to judge it unnecessary.) L. > This is an open question, opinions are welcome. > > -- > Olivier Thereaux - W3C QA - http://www.w3.org/QA > http://www.w3.org/People/olivier | http://yoda.zoy.org <http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/><L.Wood@ee.surrey.ac.uk>
Received on Monday, 28 October 2002 08:21:19 UTC