- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 14:59:41 +0900
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-validator@w3.org
Hello Bjoern, Would the result at http://validator.w3.org:8001/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bjoernsworld.de%2Fte mp%2Finvalid-xmldecl.html&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline be more in line with your expectations? Regards, Martin. At 21:14 02/09/15 +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >Hi, > >The following example document will cause horrible results by the >validator (note the missing trailing '?' in the XML declaration): > > <?xml version='1.0' encoding='iso-8859-1'> > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> > <head> > <title></title> > </head> > <body> > <p>...</p> > </body> > </html> > >(online demo at http://www.bjoernsworld.de/temp/invalid-xmldecl.html) > >First, it doesn't warn about the ill-formed XML declaration, then it >fails to detect the character encoding and prints out dozens of errors > > Error: omitted tag minimization parameter can be omitted only if > "OMITTAG NO" is specified on the SGML declaration > >for non-existent lines. > >regards.
Received on Tuesday, 1 October 2002 03:15:05 UTC