- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 20:35:27 +0200
- To: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Cc: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
* Terje Bless wrote: >[using lang and xml:lang] > >I have a bit too much on my mind to cope with keeping this concept >completely in my mind (it's a murky and cluttered place ;D). I have this >vague feeling that I didn't want to put "lang" in there because it might be >confusing and encourage the use of a deprecated attribute. Can you think of >any rational objections such as that against including it? I can greatly philosophize on delivering HTML-incompatible markup as HTML markup to user agents that do not support either markup, but since you already stepped into that mess, no, I cannot think of any objections. > IOW, you've sold me on the change and now I'm asking you to come up > with arguments to dissuade me from doing what you want me to do. > Ain't I a stinker? :-) No, but maybe on estrogen.
Received on Friday, 25 October 2002 14:35:18 UTC