Re: Beta: XHTML 1.0 in XML Schema from Tim Bagot on 2002-10-27 (www-validator@w3.org from October 2002)

From: Tim Bagot <tsb-w3-validator-0006@earth.li>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 17:31:18 +0000 (UTC)
To: <www-validator@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0210271722180.910-100000@213-152-52-166.dsl.eclipse.net.uk>

At 2002-10-27T11:36+0100, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:-

> (located at <http://www.bjoernsworld.de/temp/xhtml1-schema.html>) should
> vaidate as valid according to the associated document type definition (I
> am not sure whether to call it a valid XHTML 1.0 Strict document due to
> the informative nature of the http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1-schema/ note).
> The validator says it's invalid XHTML 1.0 Strict, see

You've more or less hit the nail on the head. The problem is that XHTML
1.0 in XML Schema (effectively) reuses the official XHTML 1.0 FPIs for its
own non-normative DTDs. I don't think an informative Note can reasonably
be expected to override a Recommendation.

Tim Bagot

Received on Sunday, 27 October 2002 12:31:40 UTC