- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:52:23 +0200
- To: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Cc: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
* Terje Bless wrote: >Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: > >>The "would validate" note is very well hidden after the super obtrusive >>"Tip of the day" and the "doctype override" note. The result is the most >>important information on the page, but you have hard times to find it at >>all. > >Any suggestions for how we could improve this? Put it at the top, <strong>, margin-left, ... >>Second, yes, the page would validate es XHTML 1.0 Strict, but who cares >>about that? It has a XHTML 1.0 Transitional document type declaration >>and I selected "override" to XHTML 1.0 Transitional, so what? Seems like you missed this one, it says "Strict" while it must say "Transitional". >>Last but >>not least, I don't need to update the page, it validates. If selected >>document type and the document type given in the document match, the >>validator should not shout at me. >Hmmm. It complains because the option is labelled as "Doctype Override" not >"Selected Doctype". Perhaps we should check for this case and supress the >warning. Definitely.
Received on Friday, 25 October 2002 07:52:14 UTC