- From: Gannon J. Dick <gdick@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 07:01:09 -0600
- To: "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "Olivier Thereaux" <ot@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-validator@w3.org>
The source is important for server configuration issues, charset, MIME type etc. when you are not positively sure what the validator is impugning. "Automatic Detection" is a curse best left to the ignorant. Gannon J. Dick ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net> To: "Olivier Thereaux" <ot@w3.org> Cc: <www-validator@w3.org> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 3:29 AM Subject: Re: Beta: outline feature broken > > * Olivier Thereaux wrote: > >On Sun, Oct 27, 2002, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > > > >> http://validator.w3.org:8001/check?uri=http://www.w3.org;outline=1 is > >> said to give an outline of the document but it does not. > > > >This was one of the big pre-beta questions among developers. > >Some said it was better if the requested feature (outline, source, etc) > >was there regardless of the result, others thought it was better to > >leave "details" out if the document is valid. > > > >This is an open question, opinions are welcome. > > It does not make sense to me to hide source/outline/ > parse tree if the user explictly requests them. > >
Received on Monday, 28 October 2002 08:01:36 UTC