- From: Maarten de Boer <mdeboer@iua.upf.es>
- Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:43:23 -0400 (EDT)
- To: liam@htmlhelp.com, www-validator@w3.org, gerald@w3.org
- Cc: sogm@kmt.hku.nl
Hello, The w3c validator tells me about the invalid use of an & in a URI, just as described in the FAQ. http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp However, I find this explanation rather dubious, when I compare it to the "Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax" RFC2396 http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt (refered to by the w3c html 4.01 reference, http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/references.html ) which says: 2.2. Reserved Characters Many URI include components consisting of or delimited by, certain special characters. These characters are called "reserved", since their usage within the URI component is limited to their reserved purpose. If the data for a URI component would conflict with the reserved purpose, then the conflicting data must be escaped before forming the URI. reserved = ";" | "/" | "?" | ":" | "@" | "&" | "=" | "+" | "$" | "," The "reserved" syntax class above refers to those characters that are allowed within a URI, but which may not be allowed within a particular component of the generic URI syntax; they are used as delimiters of the components described in Section 3. Characters in the "reserved" set are not reserved in all contexts. The set of characters actually reserved within any given URI component is defined by that component. In general, a character is reserved if the semantics of the URI changes if the character is replaced with its escaped US-ASCII encoding. I understand that this means that the & is a reserved character in URI's and that it's "usage within the URI component is limited to their reserved purpose.", which in the case of the & is seperating parameters, and not starting an entity! I hope you will agree with me on the matter (also because I am about to bet a huge amount of beer on it with a friend on mine how seems to disagree) or explain to me how I am interpreting the RFC incorrectly. Please answer me offlist - I am not subscribed. Kind regards, Maarten
Received on Wednesday, 23 October 2002 20:04:11 UTC