- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:48:47 -0000
- To: www-validator@w3.org
"Dominique Hazaël-Massieux" <dom@w3.org> wrote in message news:1035548237.7000.33.camel@stratustier... >> Yes, most of them aren't Appendix C either for other more serious >> reasons, even if they do validate (which to be honest most of w3.org >> doesn't). >Err, where did you get that most of w3.org doesn't validate? It's quite >the contrary: using an approach like in [1], I can actually affirm that >at least 45% of our traffic is for valid web pages [this is only a >lowest bound: 20 invalid documents among our 476 top visited pages]. Yes, things are getting much better in the top visited pages, there's still all of the /TR/ archive and won't ever validate. Jim.
Received on Friday, 25 October 2002 08:51:07 UTC