w3c-dist-auth@w3.org from July to September 2002 by author

B. Shadgar

• Re: Proposal: WebDAV and transaction (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Monday, 2 September)

Babich, Alan

• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions - stepping back to requirem ents (Friday, 13 September)
• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Thursday, 12 September)
• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Wednesday, 11 September)
• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Monday, 9 September)
• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Monday, 2 September)

charlescook@ukonline.co.uk

• Questions on Properties in RFC 2518 (Saturday, 20 July)

Clemm, Geoff

• RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision (Friday, 27 September)
• Required properties with no value [WAS: workspace property on res ources that aren't in workspaces] (Thursday, 26 September)
• RE: Issue: Requiring server to use / terminated URL for returned collections (Wednesday, 25 September)
• RE: XML in LOCK <owner> tag should be self-contained (Monday, 23 September)
• RE: comments on RFC2518bis-02, sec 13.16 (Monday, 23 September)
• RE: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Friday, 20 September)
• RE: ETags, was: Issues from Interop/Interim WG Meeting (Wednesday, 18 September)
• RE: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Wednesday, 18 September)
• RE: Issue: Requiring server to use / terminated URL for returned collections (Wednesday, 18 September)
• RE: ETags, was: Issues from Interop/Interim WG Meeting (Wednesday, 18 September)
• RE: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Wednesday, 18 September)
• RE: extending the DAV: HTTP header, was: Issues from Interop/Inte rim WG Meeting (Tuesday, 17 September)
• RE: Issue: Requiring server to use / terminated URL for returned collections (Tuesday, 17 September)
• RE: extending the DAV: HTTP header, was: Issues from Interop/Inte rim WG Meeting (Tuesday, 17 September)
• RE: Issue: Requiring server to use / terminated URL for returned collections (Tuesday, 17 September)
• RE: ETags, was: Issues from Interop/Interim WG Meeting (Tuesday, 17 September)
• RE: extending the DAV: HTTP header, was: Issues from Interop/Inte rim WG Meeting (Tuesday, 17 September)
• RE: Issue: Requiring server to use / terminated URL for returned coll ections (Tuesday, 17 September)
• RE: Issue: Requiring server to use / terminated URL for returned collections (Tuesday, 17 September)
• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Monday, 16 September)
• Issue: Requiring server to use / terminated URL for returned coll ections (Monday, 16 September)
• RE: Interop issue: Can we require clients to accept cookies? (Monday, 16 September)
• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions - optional versioning usage (Friday, 13 September)
• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Friday, 13 September)
• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Thursday, 12 September)
• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Thursday, 12 September)
• RE: Links to latest bis working docs (Tuesday, 10 September)
• RE: Links to latest bis working docs (Tuesday, 10 September)
• RE: What is left after LOCK/UNLOCK on null resource? (Friday, 6 September)
• RE: Interoperability for DAV:ishidden? (Thursday, 5 September)
• RE: What is left after LOCK/UNLOCK on null resource? (Thursday, 5 September)
• RE: What is left after LOCK/UNLOCK on null resource? (Thursday, 5 September)
• RE: Interoperability for DAV:ishidden? (Thursday, 5 September)
• RE: Interoperability for DAV:ishidden? (Thursday, 5 September)
• RE: Interoperability for DAV:ishidden? (Thursday, 5 September)
• RE: What is left after LOCK/UNLOCK on null resource? (Thursday, 5 September)
• RE: Interoperability for DAV:ishidden? (Thursday, 5 September)
• RE: What is left after LOCK/UNLOCK on null resource? (Thursday, 5 September)
• RE: What is left after LOCK/UNLOCK on null resource? (Wednesday, 4 September)
• RE: Interoperability for DAV:ishidden? (Wednesday, 4 September)
• RE: Bindings (Friday, 9 August)
• RE: PROPFIND vs REPORT vs depth infinity (Thursday, 8 August)
• RE: PROPFIND vs REPORT vs depth infinity (Monday, 5 August)
• RE: PROPFIND vs REPORT vs depth infinity (Monday, 5 August)
• RE: Bindings (Sunday, 4 August)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft, COPY / MOVE of live properities (Friday, 2 August)
• RE: Bindings (Friday, 2 August)
• RE: Issue: URI_URL, proposed changes (Wednesday, 31 July)
• RE: Issue: URI_URL, proposed changes (Wednesday, 31 July)
• RE: Issue: URI_URL, proposed changes (Wednesday, 31 July)
• RE: Issue: URI_URL, proposed changes (Wednesday, 31 July)
• RE: Derived objects (Monday, 29 July)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft, COPY / MOVE of live properities (Thursday, 25 July)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft, COPY / MOVE of live properities (Thursday, 25 July)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft, COPY / MOVE of live properities (Thursday, 25 July)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft, COPY / MOVE of live properities (Wednesday, 24 July)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft, property values after LOCK of unmapped URL (Wednesday, 24 July)
• RE: Questions on Properties in RFC 2518 (Saturday, 20 July)
• RE: Issue: URI_URL, proposed changes (Sunday, 14 July)
• RE: Issue: URI_URL, proposed changes (Saturday, 13 July)
• RE: Issue: URI_URL, proposed changes (Saturday, 13 July)
• RE: Issue: URI_URL, proposed changes (Thursday, 11 July)
• RE: New issue (?): locktoken (12.1.2) syntax (Thursday, 11 July)
• RE: discovering the root of a deep lock (Wednesday, 10 July)
• RE: Issue: UNLOCK_WHAT_URL (Monday, 8 July)
• RE: root of a lock, was HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Monday, 8 July)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft (Monday, 8 July)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft (Saturday, 6 July)
• RE: Issue: SOURCE_PROPERTY_UNDERSPECIFIED (Saturday, 6 July)

Dan Brotsky

• Re: Interop issue: Can we require clients to accept cookies? (Tuesday, 17 September)
• Re: What is left after LOCK/UNLOCK on null resource? (Thursday, 5 September)
• Re: What is left after LOCK/UNLOCK on null resource? (Thursday, 5 September)
• Re: Interoperability for DAV:ishidden? (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Re: New RFC2518bis draft, COPY / MOVE of live properities (Monday, 19 August)
• Re: discovering the root of a deep lock (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: Issue: UNLOCK_WHAT_URL (Monday, 8 July)
• Re: New RFC2518bis draft (Monday, 8 July)
• Re: root of a lock, was HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Monday, 8 July)
• Re: New RFC2518bis draft (Monday, 8 July)

Daniel Stone

• Re: IPv6 support in WebDAV and HTTP (Tuesday, 20 August)

Dennis E. Hamilton

• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Monday, 16 September)
• RE: Notes for Sept 9 WG meeting (by Dennis Hamilton) - HTML Available (Sunday, 15 September)
• Proposal: WebDAV and transactions - stepping back to requirements (Friday, 13 September)
• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions - optional versioning usage (Friday, 13 September)
• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Monday, 9 September)
• RE: Problem in Frontpage (Thursday, 4 July)

Dirk-Willem van Gulik

• Re: Digest authentication (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: Digest authentication (Wednesday, 18 September)
• RE: Issue: UNLOCK_WHAT_URL (Monday, 8 July)

Dyer, Kevin

• RE: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Friday, 20 September)
• RE: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Wednesday, 18 September)

Elias Sinderson

• Re: Interop issue: Can we require clients to accept cookies? (Monday, 16 September)
• Re: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Thursday, 12 September)
• Re: PROPFIND vs REPORT vs depth infinity (Friday, 9 August)

Eric Sedlar

• Re: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: ETags, was: Issues from Interop/Interim WG Meeting (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: ETags, was: Issues from Interop/Interim WG Meeting (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: ETags, was: Issues from Interop/Interim WG Meeting (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: ETags, was: Issues from Interop/Interim WG Meeting (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Friday, 13 September)
• Re: Interoperability for DAV:ishidden? (Thursday, 5 September)
• Re: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Tuesday, 10 September)
• Re: Interoperability for DAV:ishidden? (Thursday, 5 September)
• Re: Interoperability for DAV:ishidden? (Thursday, 5 September)
• Re: Interoperability for DAV:ishidden? (Thursday, 5 September)
• Re: Interoperability for DAV:ishidden? (Wednesday, 4 September)

Fernando Claverino

• webdav and internet explorer (Wednesday, 31 July)

Frank Lowney

• WebDAV and WindowsXP (Wednesday, 21 August)
• launching a WebDAV client via HTML (Wednesday, 14 August)

ganesh_k

• Doubt in error response (Thursday, 4 July)

Gary Cowan

• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Thursday, 12 September)
• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Thursday, 12 September)

Geoff Alexander

• FW: Re: Collections and Request-URIs (Monday, 1 July)

Greg Stein

• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-02.txt (Thursday, 19 September)

horner@informed.net

• webDAV - macromedia dreamweaver ultradev - error trying to 'put' a file (Friday, 26 July)

Ilya Kirnos

• Re: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Thursday, 19 September)
• Re: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Tuesday, 17 September)
• Re: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Tuesday, 17 September)
• Re: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Tuesday, 17 September)
• Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Monday, 16 September)

Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-02.txt (Wednesday, 18 September)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-02.txt (Wednesday, 18 September)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-acl-09.txt (Tuesday, 30 July)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-01.txt (Tuesday, 2 July)

Jason

• Re: launching a WebDAV client via HTML (Thursday, 15 August)

Jason Crawford

• RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision (Monday, 30 September)
• RE: Issue: Requiring server to use / terminated URL for returned collections (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision (Tuesday, 24 September)
• RE: Issue: Requiring server to use / terminated URL for returned collections (Monday, 23 September)
• RE: comments on RFC2518bis-02, sec 13.16 (Monday, 23 September)
• RE: XML in LOCK <owner> tag should be self-contained (Monday, 23 September)
• RE: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: ETags, was: Issues from Interop/Interim WG Meeting (Monday, 23 September)
• RE: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Monday, 23 September)
• RE: comments on RFC2518bis-02, sec 13.16 (Sunday, 22 September)
• Re: comments on RFC2518bis-02, sec 6.3 (Sunday, 22 September)
• Re: comments on RFC2518bis-02, sec 13.16 (Sunday, 22 September)
• Re: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Friday, 20 September)
• RE: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Wednesday, 18 September)
• RE: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: Interop issue: Can we require clients to accept cookies? (Monday, 16 September)
• RE: Notes for Sept 9 WG meeting (by Dennis Hamilton) - HTML Available (Monday, 16 September)
• Re: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision (Monday, 16 September)
• Re: FW: [Moderator Action] WEBDAV client on mainframe (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: What is left after LOCK/UNLOCK on null resource? (Wednesday, 4 September)
• RE: discovering the root of a deep lock (Monday, 2 September)
• RE: Issue: SOURCE_PROPERTY_UNDERSPECIFIED (Monday, 26 August)
• RE: xml:space (Wednesday, 21 August)
• Re: New RFC2518bis draft, COPY / MOVE of live properities (Monday, 19 August)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft, COPY / MOVE of live properities (Friday, 2 August)
• Re: Bindings, was: Issue: URI_URL, proposed changes (Thursday, 1 August)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft, COPY / MOVE of live properities (Thursday, 1 August)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft, COPY / MOVE of live properities (Wednesday, 31 July)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft, COPY / MOVE of live properities (Thursday, 25 July)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft, property values after LOCK of unmapped URL (Wednesday, 24 July)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft, property values after LOCK of unmapped URL (Monday, 22 July)
• issue: REMOVE_ETAG_SUPPORT_FOR_IF_HEADER (Monday, 22 July)
• RE: New issue (?): locktoken (12.1.2) syntax (Monday, 22 July)
• Re: discovering the root of a deep lock, HOW_TO_FIND_THE_ROOT_OF_A_LOCK (Thursday, 11 July)
• Re: New issue (?): locktoken (12.1.2) syntax (Thursday, 11 July)
• RE: discovering the root of a deep lock (Wednesday, 10 July)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft, MOVE vs COPY (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: A couple of issues (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: Issue: UNLOCK_WHAT_URL (Monday, 8 July)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft, MOVE vs COPY (Monday, 8 July)
• Issue: UNLOCK_WHAT_URL (Monday, 8 July)
• RE: root of a lock, was HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Monday, 8 July)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft, xml:lang (Saturday, 6 July)
• Re: New RFC2518bis draft, LOCK_REFRESH_BY_METHODS (Tuesday, 2 July)
• RE: Issue: SOURCE_PROPERTY_UNDERSPECIFIED (Tuesday, 2 July)

Jim Luther

• Re: Digest authentication (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: Interop issue: Can we require clients to accept cookies? (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Digest authentication (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: Interop Event FAQ (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Re: Interoperability for DAV:ishidden? (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Re: Mac OS X Client implementation issues (Monday, 29 July)
• A couple of issues (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: Q?: Tx of text type docs and CR/LF, CR, LF translation (Wednesday, 3 July)

Jim Whitehead

• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Thursday, 12 September)
• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Thursday, 12 September)
• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Thursday, 12 September)
• FW: best webDAV implementation (Tuesday, 10 September)
• FW: [Moderator Action] WEBDAV (Tuesday, 10 September)
• RE: Interoperability for DAV:ishidden? (Thursday, 5 September)
• RE: What is left after LOCK/UNLOCK on null resource? (Thursday, 5 September)
• Interop Event FAQ (Wednesday, 4 September)
• RE: Passwords and WebDAV (Tuesday, 3 September)
• FW: [Moderator Action] WebDAV clients which work over Netscape Proxies? (Thursday, 29 August)
• Coming to Interoperability Testing Event? Let me know! (Friday, 23 August)
• FYI: WSE 2002 (Sunday, 4 August)
• WebDAV Interoperability Event: New Dates (Thursday, 1 August)
• Please review draft-ietf-webdav-acl-09 (Friday, 26 July)
• Submitted -09 Access Control Protocol (Friday, 26 July)
• RE: Doubt in error response (Thursday, 25 July)
• RE: Open issues with internationalization section (Thursday, 25 July)
• FW: 207 Multi-Status success (Wednesday, 24 July)
• FW: message board on webdav (Monday, 22 July)
• RE: [Moderator Action] Quick WebDAV Question for WebSphere Advisor Magazine (Friday, 19 July)
• FW: [Moderator Action] Quick WebDAV Question for WebSphere Advisor Magazine (Friday, 19 July)
• FW: [Moderator Action] problems with ie (Thursday, 18 July)
• WebDAV/DeltaV Face-to-Face Interoperability Testing Event (Thursday, 11 July)
• FW: character encoding. (Tuesday, 9 July)
• FW: WebDav information (Wednesday, 3 July)

Joe Orton

• Re: Interop issue: Can we require clients to accept cookies? (Monday, 16 September)
• Re: Interop issue: Can we require clients to accept cookies? (Monday, 16 September)
• Re: IPv6 support in WebDAV and HTTP (Tuesday, 20 August)
• Re: FW: 207 Multi-Status success (Wednesday, 24 July)

Joel Soderberg

• RE: 55th IETF WG/BOF Scheduling - DRAFT Agenda (Monday, 30 September)

John DeSoi

• Mac OS X Client implementation issues (Monday, 29 July)

John Spaith

• XML in LOCK <owner> tag should be self-contained (Friday, 20 September)

Julian Reschke

• RE: Required properties with no value [WAS: workspace property on res ources that aren't in workspaces] (Thursday, 26 September)
• RE: comments on RFC2518bis-02, sec 13.16 (Monday, 23 September)
• RE: comments on RFC2518bis-02, sec 6.3 (Sunday, 22 September)
• RE: comments on RFC2518bis-02, sec 13.16 (Sunday, 22 September)
• RE: XML in LOCK <owner> tag should be self-contained (Friday, 20 September)
• comments on RFC2518bis-02 (Friday, 20 September)
• RE: ETags, was: Issues from Interop/Interim WG Meeting (Thursday, 19 September)
• RE: ETags, was: Issues from Interop/Interim WG Meeting (Wednesday, 18 September)
• RE: ETags, was: Issues from Interop/Interim WG Meeting (Wednesday, 18 September)
• RE: ETags, was: Issues from Interop/Interim WG Meeting (Wednesday, 18 September)
• property registry, was: Notes for Sept 9 WG meeting (by Dennis Hamilton) - HTML Available (Wednesday, 18 September)
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-02.txt (Wednesday, 18 September)
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-02.txt (Wednesday, 18 September)
• RE: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Wednesday, 18 September)
• RE: ETags, was: Issues from Interop/Interim WG Meeting (Wednesday, 18 September)
• RE: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Tuesday, 17 September)
• RE: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Tuesday, 17 September)
• RE: extending the DAV: HTTP header, was: Issues from Interop/Inte rim WG Meeting (Tuesday, 17 September)
• RE: Issue: Requiring server to use / terminated URL for returned collections (Tuesday, 17 September)
• ETags, was: Issues from Interop/Interim WG Meeting (Tuesday, 17 September)
• 302 in miultistattus, was: Issues from Interop/Interim WG Meeting (Tuesday, 17 September)
• extending the DAV: HTTP header, was: Issues from Interop/Interim WG Meeting (Tuesday, 17 September)
• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Thursday, 12 September)
• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Thursday, 12 September)
• can a non-HTTP URL be the target of a redirect (301/302) (Thursday, 12 September)
• DAV:resourceid (Thursday, 12 September)
• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Wednesday, 11 September)
• RE: Links to latest bis working docs (Tuesday, 10 September)
• RE: Links to latest bis working docs (Tuesday, 10 September)
• RE: Links to latest bis working docs (Tuesday, 10 September)
• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Monday, 9 September)
• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Monday, 9 September)
• WebDAV WG meeting -- current status of greenbytes activities (Sunday, 8 September)
• RE: Interoperability for DAV:ishidden? (Friday, 6 September)
• RE: Interoperability for DAV:ishidden? (Thursday, 5 September)
• RE: Interoperability for DAV:ishidden? (Thursday, 5 September)
• RE: Interoperability for DAV:ishidden? (Thursday, 5 September)
• RE: Interoperability for DAV:ishidden? (Thursday, 5 September)
• Interoperability for DAV:ishidden? (Wednesday, 4 September)
• RE: discovering the root of a deep lock (Monday, 2 September)
• RE: Issue: SOURCE_PROPERTY_UNDERSPECIFIED (Tuesday, 27 August)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft, COPY / MOVE of live properities (Tuesday, 20 August)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft, COPY / MOVE of live properities (Tuesday, 20 August)
• RE: Bindings (Saturday, 10 August)
• RE: Bindings (Friday, 9 August)
• RE: PROPFIND vs REPORT vs depth infinity (Thursday, 8 August)
• RE: PROPFIND vs REPORT vs depth infinity (Monday, 5 August)
• PROPFIND vs REPORT vs depth infinity (Monday, 5 August)
• RE: Bindings (Friday, 2 August)
• RE: Bindings, was: Issue: URI_URL, proposed changes (Friday, 2 August)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft, COPY / MOVE of live properities (Friday, 2 August)
• Bindings, was: Issue: URI_URL, proposed changes (Thursday, 1 August)
• RE: Issue: URI_URL, proposed changes (Wednesday, 31 July)
• RE: Issue: URI_URL, proposed changes (Wednesday, 31 July)
• RE: Web Character Model and IRI spec (Re: FW: character encoding.) (Monday, 29 July)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft, COPY / MOVE of live properities (Thursday, 25 July)
• RE: Open issues with internationalization section (Thursday, 25 July)
• RE: Open issues with internationalization section (Wednesday, 24 July)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft, property values after LOCK of unmapped URL (Wednesday, 24 July)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft, property values after LOCK of unmapped URL (Tuesday, 23 July)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft, property values after LOCK of unmapped URL (Monday, 22 July)
• RE: Questions on Properties in RFC 2518 (Saturday, 20 July)
• RE: [Moderator Action] Quick WebDAV Question for WebSphere Advisor Magazine (Friday, 19 July)
• RE: Issue: URI_URL, proposed changes (Sunday, 14 July)
• RE: Issue: URI_URL, proposed changes (Saturday, 13 July)
• RE: Issue: URI_URL, proposed changes (Saturday, 13 July)
• RE: Issue: URI_URL, proposed changes (Thursday, 11 July)
• RE: New issue (?): locktoken (12.1.2) syntax (Thursday, 11 July)
• New issue (?): locktoken (12.1.2) syntax (Wednesday, 10 July)
• discovering the root of a deep lock (Wednesday, 10 July)
• response marshalling in RFC2518, section 8.10.10 (Tuesday, 9 July)
• response marshalling in RFC2518, section 8.10.10 (Tuesday, 9 July)
• RE: root of a lock, was HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Monday, 8 July)
• RE: root of a lock, was HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER (Monday, 8 July)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft (Sunday, 7 July)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft (Thursday, 4 July)
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-mealling-iana-xmlns-registry-04.txt (Wednesday, 3 July)
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-mealling-iana-xmlns-registry-04.txt (Wednesday, 3 July)
• RE: Issue: SOURCE_PROPERTY_UNDERSPECIFIED (Tuesday, 2 July)

lakshmi@cs.utep.edu

• RE: Links to latest bis working docs (Tuesday, 10 September)

Larry Masinter

• RE: Web Character Model and IRI spec (Re: FW: character encoding.) (Saturday, 27 July)
• RE: Issue: URI_URL, proposed changes (Wednesday, 10 July)

Lisa Dusseault

• RE: 55th IETF WG/BOF Scheduling - DRAFT Agenda (Monday, 30 September)
• FW: 55th IETF WG/BOF Scheduling - DRAFT Agenda (Monday, 30 September)
• RE: ETags, was: Issues from Interop/Interim WG Meeting (Wednesday, 18 September)
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-02.txt (Wednesday, 18 September)
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-02.txt (Wednesday, 18 September)
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-02.txt (Wednesday, 18 September)
• RE: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Wednesday, 18 September)
• RE: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Wednesday, 18 September)
• RE: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Wednesday, 18 September)
• RE: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Wednesday, 18 September)
• New RFC2518 bis draft (Tuesday, 17 September)
• RE: extending the DAV: HTTP header, was: Issues from Interop/Inte rim WG Meeting (Tuesday, 17 September)
• WebDAV Meeting in Atlanta (Tuesday, 17 September)
• RE: Interop issue: Can we require clients to accept cookies? (Tuesday, 17 September)
• RE: extending the DAV: HTTP header, was: Issues from Interop/Inte rim WG Meeting (Tuesday, 17 September)
• RE: Issue: Requiring server to use / terminated URL for returned collections (Tuesday, 17 September)
• RE: Issue: Requiring server to use / terminated URL for returned collections (Tuesday, 17 September)
• RE: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision (Monday, 16 September)
• RE: Issue: Requiring server to use / terminated URL for returned coll ections (Monday, 16 September)
• Notes for Sept 9 WG meeting (by Dennis Hamilton) (Sunday, 15 September)
• Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision (Sunday, 15 September)
• Interop issue: Can we require clients to accept cookies? (Sunday, 15 September)
• Issues from Interop/Interim WG Meeting (Sunday, 15 September)
• RE: Links to latest bis working docs (Tuesday, 10 September)
• RE: Links to latest bis working docs (Tuesday, 10 September)
• Links to latest bis working docs (Tuesday, 10 September)
• RE: What is left after LOCK/UNLOCK on null resource? (Friday, 6 September)
• Announcement of WebDAV WG Interim Meeting (Thursday, 29 August)
• RE: IPv6 support in WebDAV and HTTP (Tuesday, 20 August)
• IPv6 support in WebDAV and HTTP (Tuesday, 20 August)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft, COPY / MOVE of live properities (Monday, 19 August)
• RE: Issue: SOURCE_PROPERTY_UNDERSPECIFIED (Wednesday, 24 July)
• RE: Doubt in error response (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Open issues with internationalization section (Wednesday, 24 July)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft, COPY / MOVE of live properities (Wednesday, 24 July)
• If header simplification (Wednesday, 24 July)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft, property values after LOCK of unmapped URL (Tuesday, 23 July)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft, COPY / MOVE of live properities (Tuesday, 23 July)
• WebDAV WG Meeting minutes (Thursday, 18 July)
• Agenda for WebDAV WG meeting, Yokohama (Wednesday, 10 July)
• RE: Issue: UNLOCK_WHAT_URL (Monday, 8 July)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft (Monday, 8 July)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft (Sunday, 7 July)
• RE: Problem in Frontpage (Thursday, 4 July)
• RE: New RFC2518bis draft (Wednesday, 3 July)
• RE: Tx of text type docs and CR/LF, CR, LF translation (Wednesday, 3 July)
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-mealling-iana-xmlns-registry-04.txt (Wednesday, 3 July)
• FW: I-D ACTION:draft-mealling-iana-xmlns-registry-04.txt (Wednesday, 3 July)

ME

• RE: Tx of text type docs and CR/LF, CR, LF translation (Monday, 8 July)
• Q?: Tx of text type docs and CR/LF, CR, LF translation (Wednesday, 3 July)

Michael Leditschke

• RE: What is left after LOCK/UNLOCK on null resource? (Thursday, 5 September)
• RE: What is left after LOCK/UNLOCK on null resource? (Thursday, 5 September)
• RE: What is left after LOCK/UNLOCK on null resource? (Thursday, 5 September)
• RE: What is left after LOCK/UNLOCK on null resource? (Wednesday, 4 September)
• What is left after LOCK/UNLOCK on null resource? (Wednesday, 4 September)

Pill, Juergen

• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Thursday, 12 September)
• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Wednesday, 11 September)
• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Wednesday, 11 September)
• RE: best webDAV implementation (Wednesday, 11 September)
• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Monday, 9 September)
• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Monday, 9 September)
• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Monday, 9 September)
• Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Monday, 2 September)

Robert S. Koberg

• Re: java, server-side lock/unlock resource - simple example? (Tuesday, 2 July)
• java, server-side lock/unlock resource - simple example? (Tuesday, 2 July)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: Issue: Requiring server to use / terminated URL for returned coll ections (Tuesday, 17 September)
• Re: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Tuesday, 17 September)
• Re: can a non-HTTP URL be the target of a redirect (301/302) (Friday, 13 September)
• Re: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Thursday, 12 September)
• Re: Proposal: WebDAV and transaction (Thursday, 12 September)
• Re: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: IPv6 support in WebDAV and HTTP (Tuesday, 20 August)
• Re: IPv6 support in WebDAV and HTTP (Tuesday, 20 August)
• Re: Issue: URI_URL, proposed changes (Wednesday, 31 July)

Sameer Maggon

• Problem in Frontpage (Thursday, 4 July)

Sridhar Erukulla

• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Thursday, 12 September)

Stefan Eissing

• Re: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision (Monday, 30 September)
• Re: Interop issue: Proposal for fixing lock token provision (Wednesday, 25 September)
• Re: Issue: Requiring server to use / terminated URL for returned collections (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: ETags, was: Issues from Interop/Interim WG Meeting (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: Interop issue: how can clients force authentication? (Tuesday, 17 September)
• Re: Interop issue: Can we require clients to accept cookies? (Monday, 16 September)
• Re: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Friday, 13 September)
• Re: If header simplification (Wednesday, 24 July)

Taisuke Yamada

• Re: Web Character Model and IRI spec (Re: FW: character encoding.) (Tuesday, 30 July)
• Re: Open issues with internationalization section (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Open issues with internationalization section (Thursday, 25 July)
• Web Character Model and IRI spec (Re: FW: character encoding.) (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: FW: character encoding. (Monday, 15 July)

time@w3.org

• 收購手錶 (Monday, 26 August)

Zaretzke, Peter

• RE: Proposal: WebDAV and transactions (Monday, 16 September)

Last message date: Monday, 30 September 2002 13:06:48 UTC