Re: PROPFIND vs REPORT vs depth infinity

The proposal makes sense to me, as does the error condition name.


Julian Reschke wrote:

>- REPORT not defined for this depth --> 400 (bad request)
>- REPORT is defined, but server doesn't allow depth infinity --> 403
>(forbidden). Should we define an error condition name for this situation and
>add that to the RFC3253 (proposal: "DAV:depth-infinity-allowed")?

Received on Friday, 9 August 2002 14:06:42 UTC