- From: Taisuke Yamada <tai@iij.ad.jp>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 21:08:03 +0900
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org
> Well, if a client/server uses an optional encoding (and any except > UTF-8 and UTF-16 *is* optional in XML), it may have to live with > the fact that the other side requests the message, so there's no > guaranteed interoperability. Yes, and I agree with that completely. My point was leaving encodings other than UTF-(8|16) as OPTIONAL by not mentioning is good enough, because XML states it as optional. Stating it as MUST NOT in the spec is more than necessary. -- Taisuke Yamada <tai@iij.ad.jp> Internet Initiative Japan Inc., Technical Planning Division
Received on Thursday, 25 July 2002 08:08:33 UTC