- From: Jason Crawford <ccjason@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 18:16:53 -0400
- To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2002 18:27:19 UTC
<< The W3C has decided to treat link roles as URIs. If we decide to define a different mechanism, we will sooner or later have to define a mapping of XLink role URIs to our role schema (because other systems with which a WebDAv server connect may have decided to use standard Xlink roles). >> I assume Geoff or others will respond to this and hopefully also to my questions. << Furthermore this brings *us* into the business of defining roles (I think the spec should only define a mechanism to marshall them, that's it). >> By *US* I take it you mean the WebDAV community. Is it your view that some non-WebDAV entity will end up defining XLink roles that are also pertainent to WebDAV? ------------------------------------------ Phone: 914-784-7569, ccjason@us.ibm.com
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2002 18:27:19 UTC