- From: Jason Crawford <nn683849@smallcue.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 09:12:19 -0400
- To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
On Sunday, 09/22/2002 at 12:24 ZE2, "Julian Reschke" <nnjulian.reschke___at___gmx.de@smallcue.com> wrote: > > From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org > > [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jason Crawford > > Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 2:40 AM > > To: Julian Reschke > > Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > > Subject: Re: comments on RFC2518bis-02, sec 13.16 > > > > > > > > > 27) Section 13.16 > > > > > > Remove > > > > > > "May contain additional elements not defined in this document." > > > > > > That's true for *all* XML in request/response bodies (also reccurs in > > other > > > places) > > > > It's also said in 13.17. I'd say leave it. > > I think it's wrong. *All* XML elemens may be extended. If we only mention it > for specific element, people may read it saying that this is not the case > anymore. So how about adding "as with all XML elements"? Or "as per [ref]"? I just think it's a good idea to remind folks since they won't always be aware of this. I believe there was even confusion on this list six months ago in a compatibility discussion involving the dav:source tag until this was pointed out.
Received on Sunday, 22 September 2002 09:23:10 UTC