- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 09:43:51 -0700
- To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
> but I really have a problem with the process here. Why is the I-D > submitted > *before* there is consensus on the changes? > To be clear, I thought that for all the issues in the draft, either: - they weren't controversial, - OR they were controversial but consensus (not unanimity) was close. And in any case, it's the exact wording that needs to be seen to determine real consensus. When I-D's are published, it's correct to publish them to the I-D repository, rather than just circulate them on the list. If we were only to circulate a RFC2518-bis text document on the DAV list, then non-list-members wouldn't have the same awareness and accessibility to the document that they have if documents are published correctly. Also, I thought this goes without saying, but nobody is implying that this I-D is anywhere ready for WG last call. There are major unresolved issues. We always encourage discussion and if desired straw polls on the list. lisa
Received on Wednesday, 18 September 2002 12:44:29 UTC