- From: Jason Crawford <ccjason@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:22:58 -0400
- To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org
- Message-ID: <OF8DB274B5.3EC59F9D-ON85256BF0.006A3D5D@us.ibm.com>
Just giving this one a new subject line to distinguish it from the
discussion that spun off and
is probably concluding...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Geoff Clemm [mailto:gclemm@rational.com]
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de]
> From: Lisa Dusseault
> Section 4.5: Propertybehavior (in MOVE, COPY) removed
Maybe MOVE and COPY need to be treated differently. If a server
can't move a resource with it's live properties staying alive, I'd
claim that it actually can't move the resource at all, and thus
MOVE should fail (requiring the client to fall back to
COPY/DELETE).
Opinions?
I agree that MOVE and COPY need to be treated differently, and I
further agree that MOVE should fail if live properties cannot be
maintained (requiring the client to fall back to COPY/DELETE).
Received on Monday, 8 July 2002 15:31:01 UTC