- From: Jason Crawford <ccjason@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:22:58 -0400
- To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org
- Message-ID: <OF8DB274B5.3EC59F9D-ON85256BF0.006A3D5D@us.ibm.com>
Just giving this one a new subject line to distinguish it from the discussion that spun off and is probably concluding... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Geoff Clemm [mailto:gclemm@rational.com] From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de] > From: Lisa Dusseault > Section 4.5: Propertybehavior (in MOVE, COPY) removed Maybe MOVE and COPY need to be treated differently. If a server can't move a resource with it's live properties staying alive, I'd claim that it actually can't move the resource at all, and thus MOVE should fail (requiring the client to fall back to COPY/DELETE). Opinions? I agree that MOVE and COPY need to be treated differently, and I further agree that MOVE should fail if live properties cannot be maintained (requiring the client to fall back to COPY/DELETE).
Received on Monday, 8 July 2002 15:31:01 UTC