- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 19:30:34 +0200
- To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, "'Webdav WG \(E-mail\)'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 2:02 PM > To: 'Webdav WG (E-mail)' > Subject: RE: Issue: URI_URL, proposed changes > > > > It appears below that Julian and I agree on most aspects of > this issue, with the only remaining question being "what kind > of URI should be placed in a DAV:dst field". > > I believe that the answer will always be somewhat vague, and > of the form "a URI that the user can effectively use to > author (i.e. modify the content of) the resource". Yes, that's vague, and I don't think this is a problem. > In order to author a resource via the DAV:dst URI, > minimally, you have to locate the resource (i.e. the I don't agree that it's a requirement that the resource being referred to must be authorable. For a server, it's almost impossible to decide which kinds of URIs are useful to an authoring client. So I wouldn't restrict them at all. > ...
Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2002 13:31:07 UTC