- From: Dan Brotsky <dbrotsky@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 07:19:07 -0700
- To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>
- Cc: Dan Brotsky <dbrotsky@adobe.com>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
And me. But only to the extent of specifying its meaning as a property, not to the extent of making it MUST behavior for clients. dan On Wednesday, September 4, 2002, at 06:46 AM, Clemm, Geoff wrote: > > Adding DAV:ishidden if there is demonstrable interop support for it is > fine > with me. > > Cheers, > Geoff > > -----Original Message----- > From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de] > Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:02 AM > To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > Subject: Interoperability for DAV:ishidden? > > > > Hi, > > one thing that the participants of the interop meeting may want to > consider... > > A long time ago ([1]), Microsoft proposed a live property DAV:ishidden > which > signals that a resource should be displayed as hidden in a UI. > > Support currently exists in: > > MS IIS 5.0: reports DAV:ishidden according to the file system flags of > the > underlying file system > MS webfolder client: asks for DAV:ishidden, and hides the resource > when it > is reported as hidden > SAP Enterprise Portal Server: treats DAV:ishidden as live property > with the > semantics defined in [1] > > I think this is a really useful feature, and in case we can identify > another > client that supports it, we may want to roll it into RFC2518. > > Regards, Julian > > > > [1] > <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-hopmann-collection-props- > 00.txt> > > -- > <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760 >
Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2002 10:19:44 UTC