Re: Interoperability for DAV:ishidden?

And me.  But only to the extent of specifying its meaning as a  
property, not to the extent of making it MUST behavior for clients.

     dan

On Wednesday, September 4, 2002, at 06:46 AM, Clemm, Geoff wrote:

>
> Adding DAV:ishidden if there is demonstrable interop support for it is  
> fine
> with me.
>
> Cheers,
> Geoff
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 9:02 AM
> To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
> Subject: Interoperability for DAV:ishidden?
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> one thing that the participants of the interop meeting may want to
> consider...
>
> A long time ago ([1]), Microsoft proposed a live property DAV:ishidden  
> which
> signals that a resource should be displayed as hidden in a UI.
>
> Support currently exists in:
>
> MS IIS 5.0: reports DAV:ishidden according to the file system flags of  
> the
> underlying file system
> MS webfolder client: asks for DAV:ishidden, and hides the resource  
> when it
> is reported as hidden
> SAP Enterprise Portal Server: treats DAV:ishidden as live property  
> with the
> semantics defined in [1]
>
> I think this is a really useful feature, and in case we can identify  
> another
> client that supports it, we may want to roll it into RFC2518.
>
> Regards, Julian
>
>
>
> [1]  
> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-hopmann-collection-props- 
> 00.txt>
>
> --
> <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
>

Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2002 10:19:44 UTC