- From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 14:07:19 -0700
- To: <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
> "...encoded, at minimum, using any mandatory encoding for which the > XML specification requires support." > > Note: this includes UTF-16. > > Does everybody agree to extend the encoding requirements to UTF-16? I think this is a good change, though I think it would be good for 2518bis to explicitly note that this means UTF-8 and UTF-16, since the mandatory encodings specified in the XML REC are not common knowledge. I think UTF-16 use would, at present, cause multiple interoperability problems. It would be very useful to add some UTF-16 tests to the Litmus compliance test tool, to strt moving the community in the right direction. - Jim
Received on Thursday, 25 July 2002 17:09:23 UTC