- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 09:33:21 -0700
- To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
A draft is not a consensus document. The draft contains specific text, and it is often necessary to see the specific text to find out if there is consensus. WG consensus is required to bring the draft to the IESG, not to publish a draft. lisa > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of Julian Reschke > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 5:29 AM > To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > Subject: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-02.txt > > > Sorry, > > but I really have a problem with the process here. Why is the I-D > submitted > *before* there is consensus on the changes? >
Received on Wednesday, 18 September 2002 12:34:00 UTC