RE: New RFC2518bis draft, COPY / MOVE of live properities

> I do see value in what you say at the end of your note.  There might be
> value in
> a COPY'ing server to state how it treated the liveness of properties it
> just copied.
> Similarly it might be nice for a client to be able to point to a resource
> and ask a server what liveness constraints it's trying to maintain on
> various
> properties.   But didn't we just remove the keep-alive feature? Apparently
> this
> wasn't used.  So I'm hesitant to spend time working on liveness management
> features right now.  Maybe later.  I don't think what we're currently
> proposing
> closes the door on this.


Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2002 06:35:15 UTC