- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 12:34:41 +0200
- To: "Jason Crawford" <ccjason@us.ibm.com>, "Dan Brotsky" <dbrotsky@adobe.com>
- Cc: <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
> I do see value in what you say at the end of your note. There might be > value in > a COPY'ing server to state how it treated the liveness of properties it > just copied. > Similarly it might be nice for a client to be able to point to a resource > and ask a server what liveness constraints it's trying to maintain on > various > properties. But didn't we just remove the keep-alive feature? Apparently > this > wasn't used. So I'm hesitant to spend time working on liveness management > features right now. Maybe later. I don't think what we're currently > proposing > closes the door on this. (agreed)
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2002 06:35:15 UTC