- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:22:04 -0400
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
I agree that the lock discovery should report on the root of a depth lock. Cheers, Geoff -----Original Message----- From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:39 AM To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org Subject: discovering the root of a deep lock (see also issue LOCKS_SHOULD_THEY_USE_AN_IF_HEADER_TO_VERIFY) Proposed syntax: 12.1 activelock XML Element Name: activelock Namespace: DAV: Purpose: Describes a lock on a resource. <!ELEMENT activelock (lockscope, locktype, depth, owner?, timeout?, locktoken?, lockroot?) > 12.1.x lockroot XML Element Name: lockroot Namespace: DAV: Purpose: For locks with depth infinity, servers SHOULD report the root of the lock using the DAV:lockroot element. This enables clients to know the scope of resources affected by a subsequent UNLOCK with the given lock token. For lock with depth 0, the DAV:lockroot element MUST NOT be present. <!ELEMENT lockroot (href) > -- Note: I made it a "SHOULD" in order not to break existing implementations.
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2002 09:22:36 UTC