Open issues with internationalization section

Julian suggested:

> 1) Replace
> 	"...encoded, at minimum, using the UTF-8 [UTF-8] encoding of the
> 10646 multilingual plane."
> by
> 	"...encoded, at minimum, using any mandatory encoding for which
> XML specification requires support."
> Note: this inclused UTF-16.

Does everybody agree to extend the encoding requirements to UTF-16? Will
existing clients support this if servers use it? Or do we need to be
more complicated, requiring clients to support both but servers
recommended to use UTF-8 unless they know the client supports both?

Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2002 16:15:25 UTC