Monday, 28 February 2011
- WebID-ISSUE-50: WebID deployments
- Re: issue of initiating client auth for parallel SSL sessionids
- RE: issue of initiating client auth for parallel SSL sessionids
- Re: issue of initiating client auth for parallel SSL sessionids
- RE: issue of initiating client auth for parallel SSL sessionids
- RE: issue of initiating client auth for parallel SSL sessionids
- RE: issue of initiating client auth for parallel SSL sessionids
Sunday, 27 February 2011
- RE: issue of initiating client auth for parallel SSL sessionids
- Re: issue of initiating client auth for parallel SSL sessionids
- RE: issue of initiating client auth for parallel SSL sessionids
- RE: issue of initiating client auth for parallel SSL sessionids
- RE: issue of initiating client auth for parallel SSL sessionids
- RE: issue of initiating client auth for parallel SSL sessionids
- RE: issue of initiating client auth for parallel SSL sessionids
- RE: issue of initiating client auth for parallel SSL sessionids
- RE: issue of initiating client auth for parallel SSL sessionids
- issue of initiating client auth for parallel SSL sessionids
Saturday, 26 February 2011
- 95% of webid is really easy. just the final 10% of RDF makes it hard
- RE: slow down and organize
- Re: slow down and organize
- Re: slow down and organize
- Re: slow down and organize
- RE: spec: 2 changes, UML sequence and protocol
- WebID-ISSUE-49: Keep a list of implementations of WebId up to date [implementations]
- RE: spec: 2 changes, UML sequence and protocol
- RE: slow down and organize
- RE: slow down and organize
- Re: slow down and organize
- Re: slow down and organize
- Re: slow down and organize
- Re: Basic WebID overview
- Re: spec: 2 changes, UML sequence and protocol
- Re: slow down and organize
- Re: slow down and organize
- Re: spec: 2 changes, UML sequence and protocol
Friday, 25 February 2011
Thursday, 24 February 2011
- RE: slow down and organize
- Re: slow down and organize
- [Fwd: [websec] Fwd: Do Not Track and W3C]
- RE: gnutls SAN URI support RE: slow down and organize
- RE: slow down and organize
- Re: slow down and organize
- Re: slow down and organize
- Re: slow down and organize
- Re: slow down and organize
- gnutls SAN URI support RE: slow down and organize
- RE: slow down and organize
- Basic WebID overview
- Re: slow down and organize
Wednesday, 23 February 2011
- Re: SSL and IRC RE: using foaf/webid at W3C - Re: minutes of todays teleconf
- SSL and IRC RE: using foaf/webid at W3C - Re: minutes of todays teleconf
- Re: slow down and organize
- Re: slow down and organize
- Re: spec: 2 changes, UML sequence and protocol
- RE: slow down and organize
- spec: 2 changes, UML sequence and protocol
- slow down and organize
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-48: Fighting spam with WebID [use cases]
- WebID-ISSUE-48: Fighting spam with WebID [use cases]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-45 (pgp-comparison): Compare WebId with PGP/GnuPG Web of Trust [research]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-45 (pgp-comparison): Compare WebId with PGP/GnuPG Web of Trust [research]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-45 (pgp-comparison): Compare WebId with PGP/GnuPG Web of Trust [research]
- minutes of Monday's teleconf are really up now
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-45 (pgp-comparison): Compare WebId with PGP/GnuPG Web of Trust [research]
- Re: [keyassure] publishing the public key
Tuesday, 22 February 2011
- RE: [woes] Background on JSON Web Tokens (JWTs)
- Fwd: [woes] Background on JSON Web Tokens (JWTs)
- Re: minutes of todays teleconf
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-9 (bblfish): Develop WebID Test Suite [WebID Spec]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-45 (pgp-comparison): Compare WebId with PGP/GnuPG Web of Trust [research]
- RE: [foaf-protocols] non issue comments on webid IX draft
- Re: minutes of todays teleconf
- RE: [keyassure] publishing the public key
- Re: [keyassure] publishing the public key
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-46: Signing the profile document [research]
- Re: [foaf-protocols] non issue comments on webid IX draft
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-46: Signing the profile document [research]
- Re: minutes of todays teleconf
- Re: [keyassure] publishing the public key
- RE: WebID-ISSUE-46: Signing the profile document [research]
- Re: [keyassure] publishing the public key
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-46: Signing the profile document [research]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-47: WebID and ACLs [liaison with other groups]
- WebID-ISSUE-47: WebID and ACLs [liaison with other groups]
- Re: using foaf/webid at W3C - Re: minutes of todays teleconf
- Re: using foaf/webid at W3C - Re: minutes of todays teleconf
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-46: Signing the profile document [research]
- WebID-ISSUE-46: Signing the profile document [research]
- Re: [keyassure] dane-04 trust anchors
- RE: minutes of todays teleconf
- Re: minutes of todays teleconf
- Linked Data Book
- Re: minutes of todays teleconf
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-44 (revolutionaries): Secure communication among revolutionaries [use cases]
- RE: [keyassure] publishing the public key
- Re: [foaf-protocols] non issue comments on webid IX draft
- using foaf/webid at W3C - Re: minutes of todays teleconf
- Re: [keyassure] publishing the public key
- RE: [foaf-protocols] non issue comments on webid IX draft
- RE: [keyassure] dane-04 trust anchors
- RE: step 6 spec, section 3.1
- RE: minutes of todays teleconf
- RE: [keyassure] publishing the public key
- Re: [keyassure] dane-04 trust anchors
- Re: minutes of todays teleconf
Monday, 21 February 2011
- Re: [foaf-protocols] non issue comments on webid IX draft
- Re: [keyassure] publishing the public key
- RE: [keyassure] dane-04 trust anchors
- Re: [keyassure] dane-04 trust anchors
- minutes of todays teleconf
- Re: [foaf-protocols] non issue comments on webid IX draft
- Re: step 6 spec, section 3.1
- Re: Proposals for 1st WebID XG Face-To-Face meeting
- step 6 spec, section 3.1
- RE: [keyassure] publishing the public key
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-45 (pgp-comparison): Compare WebId with PGP/GnuPG Web of Trust [research]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-45 (pgp-comparison): Compare WebId with PGP/GnuPG Web of Trust [research]
- Re: regrets
- Re: [keyassure] publishing the public key
- RE: WebID-ISSUE-45 (pgp-comparison): Compare WebId with PGP/GnuPG Web of Trust [research]
- regrets
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-45 (pgp-comparison): Compare WebId with PGP/GnuPG Web of Trust [research]
- WebID-ISSUE-45 (pgp-comparison): Compare WebId with PGP/GnuPG Web of Trust [research]
Sunday, 20 February 2011
- RE: WebID-ISSUE-9 (bblfish): Develop WebID Test Suite [WebID Spec]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-9 (bblfish): Develop WebID Test Suite [WebID Spec]
- RE: [keyassure] publishing the public key
- Re: [keyassure] publishing the public key
Saturday, 19 February 2011
- RE: WebID-ISSUE-44 (revolutionaries): Secure communication among revolutionaries [use cases]
- WebID-ISSUE-44 (revolutionaries): Secure communication among revolutionaries [use cases]
- WebID-ISSUE-43 (email): Replace email verification with WebId [use cases]
- Architecture and Use Cases
- WebID-ISSUE-42 (architecture): Describe the abstract WebId architecture
- WebID-ISSUE-41 (uses-cases): Identify Use Cases for WebId
Friday, 18 February 2011
- firewalls and TLS and DNSsec was: Web Object Encryption and Signing (WOES) at IETF
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-40 (Glossary): A glossary of the preferred terms used for talking about the WebId architecture [WebID Spec]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-40 (Glossary): A glossary of the preferred terms used for talking about the WebId architecture [WebID Spec]
- firewalls and TLS and DNSsec was: Web Object Encryption and Signing (WOES) at IETF
- WebID-ISSUE-40 (Glossary): A glossary of the preferred terms used for talking about the WebId architecture [WebID Spec]
- Re: Web Object Encryption and Signing (WOES) at IETF
- Re: Web Object Encryption and Signing (WOES) at IETF
- Re: Web Object Encryption and Signing (WOES) at IETF
- Re: Web Object Encryption and Signing (WOES) at IETF
- Re: Web Object Encryption and Signing (WOES) at IETF
- Re: Proposals for 1st WebID XG Face-To-Face meeting
- Re: Web Object Encryption and Signing (WOES) at IETF
- Re: Web Object Encryption and Signing (WOES) at IETF
- Re: Web Object Encryption and Signing (WOES) at IETF
- Re: Web Object Encryption and Signing (WOES) at IETF
- Re: Proposals for 1st WebID XG Face-To-Face meeting
- Re: Proposals for 1st WebID XG Face-To-Face meeting
- Proposals for 1st WebID XG Face-To-Face meeting
- Re: Web Object Encryption and Signing (WOES) at IETF
- Re: Web Object Encryption and Signing (WOES) at IETF
- Re: Web Object Encryption and Signing (WOES) at IETF
Thursday, 17 February 2011
- Re: Web Object Encryption and Signing (WOES) at IETF
- Web Object Encryption and Signing (WOES) at IETF
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-39: Simplify how public keys are expressed
Wednesday, 16 February 2011
- Re: How transportable are WebIDs ?
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-39: Simplify how public keys are expressed
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-39: Simplify how public keys are expressed
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-39: Simplify how public keys are expressed
- RE: Agenda for WebID Teleconf, Monday February 21 2011
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-37: Should WebFinger be mentioned in the spec? [WebID Spec]
- Re: How transportable are WebIDs ?
- Re: How transportable are WebIDs ?
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-37: Should WebFinger be mentioned in the spec? [WebID Spec]
- How transportable are WebIDs ?
- Re: ACTION-6: Move bugs form old github db to our web bug database
- ACTION-3: Look into mercurial and how mercurial and git interact
- ACTION-6: Move bugs form old github db to our web bug database
- WebID-ISSUE-39: Simplify how public keys are expressed
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-37: Should WebFinger be mentioned in the spec? [WebID Spec]
- WebID-ISSUE-38: Differentiate between the identifying agent and the user operating the identifying agent [WebID Spec]
- WebID-ISSUE-37: Should WebFinger be mentioned in the spec? [WebID Spec]
- WebID-ISSUE-36: Change reference to RFC2818 to the html version [WebID Spec]
- Agenda for WebID Teleconf, Monday February 21 2011
- Re: Agenda for WebID Teleconf, Monday February 21 2011
- Agenda for WebID Teleconf, Monday February 21 2011
Tuesday, 15 February 2011
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-5 (bblfish): Follow Work in publishing keys in DNSSEC
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-5 (bblfish): Follow Work in publishing keys in DNSSEC
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-33 (was [foaf-protocols] Webid Spec: Reference to the X.509 RFC 5280?)
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-33: Add a reference to the X.509 spec in the references sections [WebID Spec]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-32 (nodns_webid): URIs with IP addresses and security [WebID Spec]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-5 (bblfish): Follow Work in publishing keys in DNSSEC
- WebID-ISSUE-35: HTTP Status Codes [WebID Spec]
- WebID-ISSUE-34: Create a security considerations section (was [foaf-protocols] Webid Spec: Security Considerations Section?)
- WebID-ISSUE-34: Create a security considerations section [WebID Spec]
- WebID-ISSUE-33 (was [foaf-protocols] Webid Spec: Reference to the X.509 RFC 5280?)
- WebID-ISSUE-33: Add a reference to the X.509 spec in the references sections [WebID Spec]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-32 (nodns_webid): URIs with IP addresses and security [WebID Spec]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-5 (bblfish): Follow Work in publishing keys in DNSSEC
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-5 (dnssec): Follow Work in publishing keys in DNSSEC
- WebID-ISSUE-32 (nodns_webid): URIs with IP addresses and security [WebID Spec]
Monday, 14 February 2011
- RE: openssh, etc and webid
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-31 (webidOnSSH): WebID over SSH? [research]
- Re: openssh, etc and webid
- WebID-ISSUE-31 (webidOnSSH): WebID over SSH? [research]
- RE: WebID-ISSUE-5 (dnssec): Follow Work in publishing keys in DNSSEC
- openssh, etc and webid
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-30 (saml): What does WebID need to work with the SAML world? [liaison with other groups]
- WebID-ISSUE-30 (saml): What does WebID need to work with the SAML world? [liaison with other groups]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-5 (dnssec): Follow Work in publishing keys in DNSSEC
- RE: WebID-ISSUE-29 (prehistory): WebID prehistory [research]
- Re: Homeless WebID spec on w3.org
- WebID-ISSUE-29 (prehistory): WebID prehistory [research]
- Re: Homeless WebID spec on w3.org
Sunday, 13 February 2011
- RE: cab forum guide; multiple handshakes vs. signed XRD + DANE; Lampson joint authority: cloud providers and webids
- cab forum guide; multiple handshakes vs. signed XRD + DANE; Lampson joint authority: cloud providers and webids
Saturday, 12 February 2011
- RE: WebID-ISSUE-28 (bblfish): How does the WebID protocol (foaf+ssl) interact with TLS proxies [User Interface/Browsers]
- RE: WebID-ISSUE-28 (bblfish): How does the WebID protocol (foaf+ssl) interact with TLS proxies [User Interface/Browsers]
- RE: WebID-ISSUE-28 (bblfish): How does the WebID protocol (foaf+ssl) interact with TLS proxies [User Interface/Browsers]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-28 (bblfish): How does the WebID protocol (foaf+ssl) interact with TLS proxies [User Interface/Browsers]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-28 (bblfish): How does the WebID protocol (foaf+ssl) interact with TLS proxies [User Interface/Browsers]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-28 (bblfish): How does the WebID protocol (foaf+ssl) interact with TLS proxies [User Interface/Browsers]
- WebID-ISSUE-28 (bblfish): How does the WebID protocol (foaf+ssl) interact with TLS proxies [User Interface/Browsers]
- RE: Anonymity in the browser - was: nasty nasty bug in chrome
- RE: browser change; little, nothing or a lot?
- RE: browser change; little, nothing or a lot?
- Anonymity in the browser - was: nasty nasty bug in chrome
- Re: browser change; little, nothing or a lot?
- Re: browser change; little, nothing or a lot?
- browser change; little, nothing or a lot?
Friday, 11 February 2011
- Re: nasty nasty bug in chrome
- RE: [foaf-protocols] privacy considerations: can a nosy https: site probe user identity without explicit permission?
- Re: [foaf-protocols] privacy considerations: can a nosy https: site probe user identity without explicit permission?
- RE: [foaf-protocols] privacy considerations: can a nosy https: site probe user identity without explicit permission?
- RE: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: [foaf-protocols] privacy considerations: can a nosy https: site probe user identity without explicit permission?
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: privacy considerations: can a nosy https: site probe user identity without explicit permission?
- Re: privacy considerations: can a nosy https: site probe user identity without explicit permission?
- privacy considerations: can a nosy https: site probe user identity without explicit permission?
- RE: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- RE: Google's New two-legged AuthN
- Google's New two-legged AuthN
Thursday, 10 February 2011
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- RE: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- RE: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- RE: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- RE: qualified "reference" FYI
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
Wednesday, 9 February 2011
- Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- RE: nasty nasty bug in chrome
- Re: nasty nasty bug in chrome
- RE: nasty nasty bug in chrome
- Re: nasty nasty bug in chrome
- RE: nasty nasty bug in chrome
- Re: nasty nasty bug in chrome
- RE: nasty nasty bug in chrome
- Re: nasty nasty bug in chrome
- Re: [foaf-protocols] Definition of WebID?
- nasty nasty bug in chrome
- Re: [foaf-protocols] Definition of WebID?
Tuesday, 8 February 2011
- Re: [foaf-protocols] Definition of WebID?
- Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook
- Re: Homeless WebID spec on w3.org
- Re: Homeless WebID spec on w3.org
- Re: Account Management in Firefox 5
- RE: German eID
- RE: qualified "reference" FYI
- RE: Account Management in Firefox 5
- RE: Account Management in Firefox 5
- Re: Account Management in Firefox 5
- Account Management in Firefox 5
- RE: WebID-ISSUE-27 (bblfish): track electronic IDentity (eID) initivatives [liaison with other groups]
- RE: qualified "reference" FYI
- Re: qualified "reference" FYI
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-27 (bblfish): track electronic IDentity (eID) initivatives [liaison with other groups]
- qualified "reference" FYI
- RE: WebID-ISSUE-27 (bblfish): track electronic IDentity (eID) initivatives [liaison with other groups]
- RE: WebID-ISSUE-27 (bblfish): track electronic IDentity (eID) initivatives [liaison with other groups]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-27 (bblfish): track electronic IDentity (eID) initivatives [liaison with other groups]
- Re: Minutes of the 2011-02-07 WebID XG meeting
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-27 (bblfish): track electronic IDentity (eID) initivatives [liaison with other groups]
- WebID-ISSUE-27 (bblfish): track electronic IDentity (eID) initivatives [liaison with other groups]
- RE: German eID
- Re: German eID
- RE: German eID
- RE: German eID
- RE: German eID
- Re: German eID
- Re: German eID
- Re: German eID
- German eID
- Re: Terminology section added to WebID wiki
Monday, 7 February 2011
- Re: Minutes of the 2011-02-07 WebID XG meeting
- RE: Minutes of the 2011-02-07 WebID XG meeting
- Re: Minutes of the 2011-02-07 WebID XG meeting
- Re: Minutes of the 2011-02-07 WebID XG meeting
- Re: Unable to participate in telco today
- Unable to participate in telco today
- use of IAN for driving the birrel/lampson handoff rule; different semantics to the current IAN "issue" on the books
- Terminology section added to WebID wiki
- Minutes of the 2011-02-07 WebID XG meeting
- WebID Teleconf, Monday February 7th 2011
- position for telecon
Sunday, 6 February 2011
Saturday, 5 February 2011
- Re: [foaf-protocols] Definition of WebID?
- Re: [foaf-protocols] Definition of WebID?
- Re: [foaf-protocols] Definition of WebID?
- Definition of WebID?
Friday, 4 February 2011
- Apologies for WebID Teleconf, Monday February 7th 2011
- RE: WebID-ISSUE-19: x509v3 Independence and TLS Extensions [WebID Spec]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-19: x509v3 Independence and TLS Extensions [WebID Spec]
- RE: WebID-ISSUE-19: x509v3 Independence and TLS Extensions [WebID Spec]
- RE: Documenting implicit assumptions?
- Re: Documenting implicit assumptions?
- RE: On behalf of
- Re: On behalf of
- Re: On behalf of
- RE: Turning every Web Server into a CA
- On behalf of
- Re: WebID prehistory
- Re: Turning every Web Server into a CA
- Re: Turning every Web Server into a CA
- RE: WebID-ISSUE-19: x509v3 Independence and TLS Extensions [WebID Spec]
- RE: WebID-ISSUE-19: x509v3 Independence and TLS Extensions [WebID Spec]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-19: x509v3 Independence and TLS Extensions [WebID Spec]
Thursday, 3 February 2011
- Turning every Web Server into a CA
- working with the world, as it adapts to changes in the role of DNS
- RE: WebID prehistory
- Agenda for WebID Teleconf, Monday February 7th 2011
- Re: WebID prehistory
- RE: WebID prehistory
- Re: WebID prehistory
- RE: WebID prehistory
- WebID prehistory
Wednesday, 2 February 2011
- Re: Mercurial Repository available
- RE: WebID-ISSUE-26: [WebID Spec]
- WebID-ISSUE-26: [WebID Spec]
- WebID-ISSUE-25 (bblfish): List of semweb related papers [research]
- RE: Documenting implicit assumptions?
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-19: x509v3 Independence and TLS Extensions [WebID Spec]
- Re: Documenting implicit assumptions?
- RE: WebID-ISSUE-19: x509v3 Independence and TLS Extensions [WebID Spec]
- Re: Fwd: Re: Documenting implicit assumptions?
Tuesday, 1 February 2011
- RE: Peter's wish protocol
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-19: x509v3 Independence and TLS Extensions [WebID Spec]
- RE: Peter's wish protocol
- RE: Peter's wish protocol
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-22: Key Pair Revocation / WebID reset [WebID Spec]
- Peter's wish protocol
- Re: WebID-ISSUE_22: Key Pair Revocation / WebID reset [WebID Spec]
- Re: Documenting implicit assumptions?
- RE: WebID-ISSUE-22: Key Pair Revocation / WebID reset [WebID Spec]
- Fwd: Re: Documenting implicit assumptions?
- RE: WebID-ISSUE-19: x509v3 Independence and TLS Extensions [WebID Spec]
- RE: WebID-ISSUE-19: x509v3 Independence and TLS Extensions [WebID Spec]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-19: x509v3 Independence and TLS Extensions [WebID Spec]
- RE: Documenting implicit assumptions?
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-19: x509v3 Independence and TLS Extensions [WebID Spec]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-21: Temporally Weak URI Ownership [WebID Spec]
- RE: Documenting implicit assumptions?
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-23: Authorized Representations and Dereferencing a WebID URI [WebID Spec]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-24: Privacy issues from WebID URI dereferencing [WebID Spec]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-24: Privacy issues from WebID URI dereferencing [WebID Spec]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-24: Privacy issues from WebID URI dereferencing [WebID Spec]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-24: Privacy issues from WebID URI dereferencing [WebID Spec]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-22: Key Pair Revocation / WebID reset [WebID Spec]
- Re: Documenting implicit assumptions?
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-22: Key Pair Revocation / WebID reset [WebID Spec]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-20: Portable and Hosted Certificates [WebID Spec]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-20: Portable and Hosted Certificates [WebID Spec]
- WebID-ISSUE-24: Privacy issues from WebID URI dereferencing [WebID Spec]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-18: Transfer Protocol Independence [WebID Spec]
- WebID-ISSUE-23: Authorized Representations and Dereferencing a WebID URI [WebID Spec]
- Re: Documenting implicit assumptions?
- WebID-ISSUE-22: Key Pair Revocation / WebID reset [WebID Spec]
- WebID-ISSUE-21: Temporally Weak URI Ownership [WebID Spec]
- Re: WebID-ISSUE-18: Transfer Protocol Independence [WebID Spec]
- WebID-ISSUE-20: Portable and Hosted Certificates [WebID Spec]
- WebID-ISSUE-19: x509v3 Independence and TLS Extensions [WebID Spec]
- WebID-ISSUE-18: Transfer Protocol Independence [WebID Spec]
- Re: Documenting implicit assumptions?
- Re: Documenting implicit assumptions?
- RE: Documenting implicit assumptions?
- RE: WebID-ISSUE-10 (bblfish): Hash URLs for Agents [ontologies]
- Re: Documenting implicit assumptions?
- RE: Documenting implicit assumptions?