- From: peter williams <home_pw@msn.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 04:17:29 -0800
- To: "'Henry Story'" <henry.story@bblfish.net>, 'László Török' <ltorokjr@gmail.com>
- CC: <nathan@webr3.org>, "'Melvin Carvalho'" <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, "'WebID XG'" <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
An implied requirement of webid protocol is being drawn out though, to be made explicit in writing. That the cert attribute in the profile must be publicly readable, and the profile must have a public readability too. If this was an IETF moderated process, the security section would have to make it clear that - and ill use directory terminology to be generic - the directory administrator typically has the power to avoid ACLs and write security values (such as certs) and be well be the security authority who issues a .p12 file to a directory user keying their user agent for strong authyentication (to the directory, and public directory service consumers like mail agents). The security section is distinguishing the "orientation" of the main text that may talk about users doing the above, implying there are security properties that are normally true; normally until one considers the power of the admin with elevated privileges. -----Original Message----- From: public-xg-webid-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-webid-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Henry Story Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 3:22 AM To: László Török Cc: nathan@webr3.org; Melvin Carvalho; WebID XG Subject: Re: Question: User Story -- Bootstrapping Facebook On 10 Feb 2011, at 11:08, László Török wrote: > > Ultimately, there are three questions for facebook here: > - would you ever allow users to sign in to facebook using webid(s)? > - would you ever allow people to use their facebook uri as a webid? > - would you publish users profile data (subject to their privacy settings) in a machine readable way, at the profile uri? > > Probably implicit, but: Would Fb let me publich my public key as part of my profile? Could that be made public (without signing in)? None of these are technical questions. I don't see how we can answer them here. That is why I was suggesting that if we turn this into a HOWTO for the wiki to be turned into a deliverable, or added to the documentation, we should not be using real company names. We can be a little bit more general and speak of transforming Web2.0 services with profile pages into WebId enabled services, as done here: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Foaf%2Bssl/HOWTO#HOWTO_foaf.2Bssl_enable_your_Web_2.0 _application At the same time I imagine that what will happen is that these types of experiences will end up being written up in reviews, books and so on, and in very great detail, taking into account all the special cases. But we don't need to wait for that to happen. We can have a space to help people who are willing to think for themselves enough to get going. Henry Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Thursday, 10 February 2011 12:18:26 UTC