- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 13:13:45 +0000
- To: WebID XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
Hi All, An increasingly common use case on the web, and one we may need to factor in, is the mashing of computations and continuations, as outlined in CREST [1]. A common model outlined in the CloudStorage DI [2], is to separate the applications from the storage, such that each x in the (rough) model below is a data source, and the app is running in the agent (client side) with auth being peer to peer, app to data tier, as enabled by web id. x x x x x \ \ | / / \ \ | / / agent However, if we factor in services which mashup data, as below where each s is a service: x x x x x \ / | \ / s | s \ | / \ | / agent And we suppose that each x is ident/acl controlled, then s will need to contact x on behalf of the agent. We currently don't have a solution for this (?) Such that currently, each agent would have to GET the data from x, pass it to s for computation, then GET back the result from s - which means s would be handling private data, and thus would need to be trusted. x x x \ | / \ | / agent | | s s Alternatively, each s could be an agent with a webid of it's own, and we could give a acl access to our x's - loosing the distinction between services and user agents, such that we just have agents, and agents have identities. x x x x x \ \ | / / a - a - a - a - a Or perhaps, we have data storage agents, thus making no distinctions at all, and everything is just an agent a--a--a |\/|\/| a--a--a I'm unsure which of these models is optimal, and whether we can preclude any, or have to cater for each, but it may be good to spend some time thinking about it. [1] http://www.erenkrantz.com/CREST/ [2] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/CloudStorage.html Thanks to Joe Geldart (@arnia) for pointing this out. Best, Nathan
Received on Friday, 4 February 2011 13:15:56 UTC