- From: Reto Bachmann-Gmür <reto.bachmann@trialox.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:06:45 +0100
- To: nathan@webr3.org, WebID XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <1298488005.1461.6.camel@Nokia-N900-51-1>
Hi Nathan 48 issues haven been raised, but this doesn't mean we should focus on all of them, in fact only one issue (architecture) has yet been opened. cheers, reto ----- Original message ----- > Hi All, > > I admit it, I've lost track - to be honest I think almost everybody has, > can somebody who hasn't lost track write up a mail explaining where we > are now? > > I strongly feel we need to get a grip of the issues, group them > together, work out what's in scope and what's out of scope, focus on > some things and start getting a good sense of where we actually are, > perhaps it's just me, but really, at the moment I don't have a clue, it > almost feels like we've moved discussions in to re architecturing a huge > chunk of internet security, rather than WebID (which I've always taken > to mean Web Identification / Web Identifiers). > > There are currently 48 issues, and there is no order of precedence, no > real dependencies listed, and no kind of grouping. We need to sorth that. > > Additionally, the volume of mail is such that I certainly can't keep up, > and when I try to half the mails make no sense as they're completely out > of context - my main worry is that I devote about 80 hours a week to the > w3c groups, and if I can't make head nor tail of it, how can anybody > else? > > Can we do something about this, either discuss on list or hold an > interim clean-up / focus meeting asap. > > Cheers, > > Nathan >
Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2011 19:10:01 UTC