Re: slow down and organize

Hi Nathan

48 issues haven been raised, but this doesn't mean we should focus on all of them, in fact only one issue (architecture) has yet been opened.

cheers,
reto

----- Original message -----
> Hi All,
> 
> I admit it, I've lost track - to be honest I think almost everybody has, 
> can somebody who hasn't lost track write up a mail explaining where we 
> are now?
> 
> I strongly feel we need to get a grip of the issues, group them 
> together, work out what's in scope and what's out of scope, focus on 
> some things and start getting a good sense of where we actually are, 
> perhaps it's just me, but really, at the moment I don't have a clue, it 
> almost feels like we've moved discussions in to re architecturing a huge 
> chunk of internet security, rather than WebID (which I've always taken 
> to mean Web Identification / Web Identifiers).
> 
> There are currently 48 issues, and there is no order of precedence, no 
> real dependencies listed, and no kind of grouping. We need to sorth that.
> 
> Additionally, the volume of mail is such that I certainly can't keep up, 
> and when I try to half the mails make no sense as they're completely out 
> of context - my main worry is that I devote about 80 hours a week to the 
> w3c groups, and if I can't make head nor tail of it, how can anybody
> else?
> 
> Can we do something about this, either discuss on list or hold an 
> interim clean-up / focus meeting asap.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Nathan
> 

Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2011 19:10:01 UTC