- From: Daniel Renfer <duck@kronkltd.net>
- Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 21:11:00 -0500
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- Cc: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org, WebID XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > Melvin Carvalho wrote: >> >> On 5 February 2011 03:42, Daniel Renfer <duck@kronkltd.net> wrote: >>> >>> Wouldn't the fact that it's able to access other resources imply that >>> it is an Agent of some sort? The interpretation of what it takes to be >>> an agent might need to be a bit broader then what it currently is. >> >> I havent considered all possibilities of this but let's take an example. >> >> An online account ( foaf : account ) has access to a bulletin board. > > a user X who holds Y has access to access to bulletin board Z ? > > it's not the account that has access, it's the account holder > >> Now AIUI an online account is normally disjoint from an Agent? > Wouldn't the agent part of the online account be the software that runs the forum. The agent is then related to the user account by {agent services account} So the agent would be the running instance of the blogging software running on a server providing services for a user account belonging to another agent (person)
Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2011 02:11:53 UTC