- From: Daniel Renfer <duck@kronkltd.net>
- Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 21:42:07 -0500
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Cc: foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org, WebID XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
Wouldn't the fact that it's able to access other resources imply that it is an Agent of some sort? The interpretation of what it takes to be an agent might need to be a bit broader then what it currently is. On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > You know it's month 1 of an XG when people start asking for definitions :) > > Do we have WebID (distinct from The WebID Protocol [1], and The WebID > Profile [2]) defined anywhere? > > It used to have domain of foaf : Agent, but I think now is any URI? > > In the world of URIs (tho universal does not imply unique), It strikes > me that any URI that points to a resource, that may need access, to > any other URI, has use for this technology? > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/spec/#the-webid-protocol > [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/spec/#the-webid-profile > _______________________________________________ > foaf-protocols mailing list > foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org > http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols >
Received on Saturday, 5 February 2011 02:43:01 UTC