It's correct that the hard version of the problem is the logout problem - which is only a coded way of talking about that which cannot be named: sessions. > From: corani@gmail.com > Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 23:28:16 +0800 > To: henry.story@bblfish.net > CC: jan@wildeboer.net; public-xg-webid@w3.org; foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org > Subject: Re: [foaf-protocols] privacy considerations: can a nosy https: site probe user identity without explicit permission? > I believe this is very similar to the "logout" problem, and should be > solved in conjunction with that.
Received on Friday, 11 February 2011 18:11:21 UTC