public-webapi@w3.org from April 2006 by date

Saturday, 29 April 2006

• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object Suggestion Jim Ley

Friday, 28 April 2006

• XMLHttpRequest Object Suggestion Patrick Kohler

Thursday, 27 April 2006

• Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseXML and invalid XML documents Ian Hickson
• Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseXML and invalid XML documents Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseXML and invalid XML documents Jonas Sicking

Wednesday, 26 April 2006

• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - testable assertions Ian Hickson
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - WHAT WG in Introduction section Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - testable assertions Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XMLHttpRequest.abort() Ian Hickson
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? Ian Hickson
• Re: XMLHttpRequest.abort() Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - DOM 3 Load and Save Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - clarity of language Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - version of reference technologies Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - testable assertions Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseXML and invalid XML documents Ian Hickson
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events Ian Hickson
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - testable assertions Karl Dubost
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? Ian Hickson
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - WHAT WG in Introduction section Karl Dubost
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Class of Products Karl Dubost
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? Ian Hickson
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - no interoperable implementations Karl Dubost
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - DOM 3 Load and Save Karl Dubost
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Ian Hickson
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Ian Hickson
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - clarity of language Karl Dubost
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - version of reference technologies Karl Dubost
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - history in Introduction section Karl Dubost
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Ian Hickson
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - testable assertions Ian Hickson
• Re: cookies and XMLHttpRequest Ian Hickson

Tuesday, 25 April 2006

• New co-chair: Charles McCathieNevile Robin Berjon
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events Jim Ley
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events Jonas Sicking
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events Gorm Haug Eriksen
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events Jonas Sicking
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events Jim Ley
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events Jonas Sicking
• Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseXML and invalid XML documents Jonas Sicking

Monday, 24 April 2006

• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Any update on telcon times? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseXML and invalid XML documents Hallvord R. M. Steen
• Re: Issue: request bodies Mark Baker
• Re: Any update on telcon times? Robin Berjon
• Re: cookies and XMLHttpRequest David Flanagan
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseXML and invalid XML documents Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseXML and invalid XML documents Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events Gorm Haug Eriksen
• Re: Any update on telcon times? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Any update on telcon times? Jonas Sicking
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-43: change to "common baseline"? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-47: responseText is not always accessible when readyState < 3 Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Anne van Kesteren
• F2F registration questionnaire Robin Berjon
• Re: XMLHttpRequest readystatechange events Robin Berjon
• Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseXML and invalid XML documents Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XMLHttpRequest readystatechange events Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Brad Fults
• Re: cookies and XMLHttpRequest Jonas Sicking
• Re: cookies and XMLHttpRequest David Flanagan
• Re: XMLHttpRequest.responseXML and invalid XML documents Boris Zbarsky

Friday, 21 April 2006

• XMLHttpRequest.responseXML and invalid XML documents Hallvord R. M. Steen

Sunday, 23 April 2006

• Re: XMLHttpRequest readystatechange events Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? Jonas Sicking
• Re: No arguments to XMLHttpRequest.send (ACTION-58) Jonas Sicking
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events Robin Berjon
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XMLHttpRequest readystatechange events Robin Berjon
• Re: XMLHttpRequest progress events Robin Berjon
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Jim Ley
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Jim Ley
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• XMLHttpRequest progress events Boris Zbarsky
• XMLHttpRequest readystatechange events Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Brad Fults
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Robin Berjon
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? Robin Berjon
• Re: cookies and XMLHttpRequest Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-77: DOM3EV: Effect of evt.currentTarget.add/removeEL Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XMLHttpRequest test suite suggestion Jonas Sicking
• Re: Issue: request bodies Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-77: DOM3EV: Effect of evt.currentTarget.add/removeEL Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Issue: request bodies Mark Nottingham
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Robin Berjon
• [XHR] What mime types should trigger XML parsing? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Issue: request bodies Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Maciej Stachowiak

Saturday, 22 April 2006

• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Issue: request bodies Mark Baker
• Re: Issue: request bodies Mark Nottingham
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Robin Berjon

Friday, 21 April 2006

• XMLHttpRequest.abort() David Flanagan
• cookies and XMLHttpRequest David Flanagan

Saturday, 22 April 2006

• Re: Issue: request bodies Mark Baker
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Julian Reschke
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Jim Ley
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Jim Ley
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - WHAT WG in Introduction section Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Class of Products Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - no interoperable implementations Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - DOM 3 Load and Save Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - testable assertions Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - clarity of language Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - version of reference technologies Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Issue: request bodies Julian Reschke
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Brad Fults

Friday, 21 April 2006

• Re: Issue: request bodies Mark Nottingham
• Re: Issue: request bodies Julian Reschke
• Provisions for canceling XMLHttpRequests Boris Zbarsky
• Question on what "the script's context" means Boris Zbarsky
• XMLHttpRequest test suite suggestion Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Jim Ley
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Jim Ley
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Jim Ley
• ISSUE-31: default character encoding XHR Anne van Kesteren
• Re: No arguments to XMLHttpRequest.send (ACTION-58) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Mark Nottingham
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - history in Introduction section Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Ian Hickson
• Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Abstract section Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Mark Nottingham
• Issue: request bodies Mark Nottingham
• Issue: Authentication Credentials Mark Nottingham
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback Mark Nottingham
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XHR timeout and browsing context destruction Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Ian Hickson

Thursday, 20 April 2006

• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Mark Baker
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Robin Berjon
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Robin Berjon
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Mark Nottingham
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Mark Baker
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Jonas Sicking
• Re: A typo in the XMLHttpRequest Object spec Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Small typo Anne van Kesteren
• Re: DOM3EV: Which events are fired for name mutations Robin Berjon
• Re: References in XHR spec Anne van Kesteren
• Re: DOM3EV: Editorial comments Cameron McCormack
• Re: DOM3EV: Specifying inappropriate modifiers to MouseEvent.initMouseEventNS Robin Berjon
• Re: DOM3EV: Editorial comments Robin Berjon
• DOM3EV: Which events are fired for name mutations Cameron McCormack
• DOM3EV: Specifying inappropriate modifiers to MouseEvent.initMouseEventNS Cameron McCormack
• DOM3EV: MouseEvent.client[XY] clarification Cameron McCormack

Wednesday, 19 April 2006

• Re: DOM3EV: Editorial comments Cameron McCormack
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Gorm Haug Eriksen
• Re: DOM3EV: Editorial comments Bjoern Hoehrmann
• ISSUE-77: DOM3EV: Effect of evt.currentTarget.add/removeEL Web APIs Issue Tracker

Tuesday, 18 April 2006

• Re: ACTION-61: text for embedding part of the Window object Boris Zbarsky
• Re: several messages Jim Ley
• Re: ACTION-52 - open() and authentication Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: several messages Ian Hickson
• Re: several messages Ian Davis
• Re: several messages Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Gorm Haug Eriksen
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Robin Berjon
• Re: XMLHttpRequest object suggestion Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Second proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Extension HTTP methods Gorm Haug Eriksen
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Second proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Second proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest Ian Davis
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Second proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest Ian Davis
• RE: XMLHttpRequest object suggestion Mark Birbeck

Monday, 17 April 2006

• XMLHttpRequest object suggestion Mark Kawakami
• (XMLHttpRequest 2) Second proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest Ian Hickson
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest Ian Hickson
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest Ian Hickson
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest Mark Nottingham

Saturday, 15 April 2006

• Extension HTTP methods Pete Kirkham
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest Alex Russell

Monday, 17 April 2006

• Re: DOM3EV: Editorial comments Cameron McCormack

Sunday, 16 April 2006

• Re: DOM3EV: Editorial comments Robin Berjon
• DOM3EV: Editorial comments Cameron McCormack

Saturday, 15 April 2006

• XHR constructor example Daniel Schierbeck
• Re: ACTION-25: Make a proposal for the additions that the mobile folks have been asking for in keyboard events Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: ACTION-25: Make a proposal for the additions that the mobile folks have been asking for in keyboard events Cameron McCormack
• Re: ACTION-25: Make a proposal for the additions that the mobile folks have been asking for in keyboard events Jonas Sicking
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Jonas Sicking
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Jonas Sicking

Friday, 14 April 2006

• Re: ACTION-25: Make a proposal for the additions that the mobile folks have been asking for in keyboard events Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest Ian Hickson
• Re: ACTION-25: Make a proposal for the additions that the mobile folks have been asking for in keyboard events Ian Hickson
• Re: Potential security risk of XHR in distributed authoring Ian Hickson
• Pressure Sensitivity for Tablets Doug Schepers
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Ian Hickson
• RE: ACTION-25: Make a proposal for the additions that the mobile folks have been asking for in keyboard events Doug Schepers
• RE: ACTION-25: Make a proposal for the additions that the mobile folks have been asking for in keyboard events Doug Schepers
• FYI: XHR HTTP tests updated Mark Nottingham
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest Mark Nottingham
• ACTION-25: Make a proposal for the additions that the mobile folks have been asking for in keyboard events Robin Berjon
• Potential security risk of XHR in distributed authoring Julian Reschke
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Jim Ley
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Jonas Sicking
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest Ian Hickson
• [comment] Window Object 1.0 - URI Karl Dubost
• [comment] Window Object 1.0 - References Karl Dubost
• [comment] Window Object 1.0 - HTML User Agent Karl Dubost
• [comment] Window Object 1.0 - General Comment Karl Dubost
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest Mark Nottingham
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest Ian Hickson

Thursday, 13 April 2006

• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest Mark Nottingham
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Jonas Sicking
• DOM Level 3 Events publication Dean Jackson
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Christophe Jolif
• Re: ISSUE-76: Shoud window participate in event propagation Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Further update to Window Object 1.0, I think it's ready for first Working Draft Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-76: Shoud window participate in event propagation Robin Berjon
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Jim Ley
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Christophe Jolif
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Jim Ley
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Jonas Sicking
• Re: Further update to Window Object 1.0, I think it's ready for first Working Draft Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Jim Ley
• Re: Further update to Window Object 1.0, I think it's ready for first Working Draft Boris Zbarsky
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Further update to Window Object 1.0, I think it's ready for first Working Draft Boris Zbarsky
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Jonas Sicking

Wednesday, 12 April 2006

• ISSUE-76: Shoud window participate in event propagation Web APIs Issue Tracker
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Jim Ley
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Jonas Sicking
• Re: Further update to Window Object 1.0, I think it's ready for first Working Draft Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-60: Should Window Object 1.0 include access to frames by name (window.frames)? Brad Fults
• Re: Further update to Window Object 1.0, I think it's ready for first Working Draft Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Jim Ley
• [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - history in Introduction section Karl Dubost
• [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - WHAT WG in Introduction section Karl Dubost
• [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Class of Products Karl Dubost
• [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Abstract section Karl Dubost
• [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - no interoperable implementations Karl Dubost
• [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - DOM 3 Load and Save Karl Dubost
• [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Conformance Model Karl Dubost
• [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - testable assertions Karl Dubost
• [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - clarity of language Karl Dubost
• [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - version of reference technologies Karl Dubost
• [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility Karl Dubost
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Jonas Sicking

Tuesday, 11 April 2006

• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Julian Reschke

Wednesday, 12 April 2006

• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Ian Hickson

Tuesday, 11 April 2006

• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Julian Reschke
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Ian Hickson
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Jonas Sicking
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Jonas Sicking
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Julian Reschke
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Jonas Sicking
• Re: in defence of listener discovery (ISSUE-32, ACTION-84) Jonas Sicking
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest Jim Ley
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest Ian Hickson
• RE: Proposal for mousewheel events Doug Schepers
• RE: Proposal for mousewheel events Doug Schepers
• Re: Small typo Jim Ley
• Small typo Douglas Livingstone
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest Maciej Stachowiak
• A typo in the XMLHttpRequest Object spec Pawel Glowacki
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Jim Ley
• ISSUE-33 and ISSUE-56: multiple device events and mousewheel events Stéphane Sire
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Robin Berjon
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Julian Reschke
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Julian Reschke
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Jonas Sicking
• re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest Ian Hickson
• re: (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest Darin Fisher
• Re: XHR: restrictions on request headers Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-73: Are we going to support non-ECMAScript languages? Jonas Sicking
• XHR: restrictions on request headers Maciej Stachowiak

Monday, 10 April 2006

• Re: in defence of listener discovery (ISSUE-32, ACTION-84) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Proposal for mousewheel events Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Proposal for mousewheel events Sjoerd Visscher
• Re: ISSUE-73: Are we going to support non-ECMAScript languages? Cameron McCormack
• Re: Proposal for mousewheel events Boris Zbarsky
• Re: ISSUE-73: Are we going to support non-ECMAScript languages? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Proposal for mousewheel events Sjoerd Visscher
• Re: passive Copy-and-Paste with scripts Jonas Sicking
• Re: Proposal for mousewheel events Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Proposal for mousewheel events Sjoerd Visscher
• (XMLHttpRequest 2) Proposal for cross-site extensions to XMLHttpRequest Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-73: Are we going to support non-ECMAScript languages? Jonas Sicking
• Re: in defence of listener discovery (ISSUE-32, ACTION-84) Al Gilman
• Re: the XML HttpRequest Object Daniel Weitzner
• First Public WD of Window released Dean Jackson
• Re: Proposal for mousewheel events Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Proposal for mousewheel events Boris Zbarsky
• the XML HttpRequest Object Mike Norton
• Re: passive Copy-and-Paste with scripts Jim Ley
• Re: passive Copy-and-Paste with scripts Paul Libbrecht
• Re: Proposal for mousewheel events Sjoerd Visscher
• Re: Proposal for mousewheel events Sjoerd Visscher
• RE: Proposal for mousewheel events Doug Schepers
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? Jonas Sicking
• Re: minutes 2006-03-20 Jonas Sicking

Sunday, 9 April 2006

• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? Jim Ley
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? Robin Berjon
• minutes 2006-03-20 Charles McCathieNevile
• Minutes 2006-03-27 Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback Jim Ley
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback Jonas Sicking
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback Jim Ley
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? Jonas Sicking
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? Robin Berjon
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback Robin Berjon
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? Robin Berjon

Saturday, 8 April 2006

• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? Jim Ley
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? Jonas Sicking

Friday, 7 April 2006

• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback Mark Nottingham
• Re: ISSUE-71: setRequestHeader has too many header restrictions Jim Ley
• Re: ISSUE-71: setRequestHeader has too many header restrictions Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-71: setRequestHeader has too many header restrictions Ian Hickson
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback Jim Ley
• Re: XMLHttpRequest status update Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-71: setRequestHeader has too many header restrictions Jonas Sicking
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback Mark Nottingham
• Re: ISSUE-71: setRequestHeader has too many header restrictions Boris Zbarsky
• Re: ISSUE-74: what does it mean for XHR to support more methods? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-71: setRequestHeader has too many header restrictions Anne van Kesteren
• XMLHttpRequest status update Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-48: Partial Information when in Receiving state Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Anne van Kesteren
• Re: The XMLHttpRequest Object - W3C Working Draft 05 April 2006 Anne van Kesteren
• The XMLHttpRequest Object - W3C Working Draft 05 April 2006 Bruno Cuart
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Jonas Sicking
• Core DOM class extensions that are in many browsers Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: several messages Ian Hickson
• Re: several messages Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-73: Are we going to support non-ECMAScript languages? Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-73: Are we going to support non-ECMAScript languages? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-73: Are we going to support non-ECMAScript languages? Ian Hickson
• Re: several messages Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? Maciej Stachowiak
• RESOLUTION? Re: ISSUE-65: Should Window spec add parentWindow property to documents? Maciej Stachowiak
• RESOLUTION? Re: ISSUE-59: Should Window 1.0 include history? Maciej Stachowiak
• RESOLUTION? Re: ISSUE-68: What to do about window.location.toString()? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: several messages Cameron McCormack

Thursday, 6 April 2006

• Re: several messages Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: passive Copy-and-Paste with scripts Jonas Sicking
• Re: several messages Boris Zbarsky
• Re: several messages Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-73: Are we going to support non-ECMAScript languages? Cameron McCormack
• Re: ISSUE-73: Are we going to support non-ECMAScript languages? Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-65: Should Window spec add parentWindow property to documents? Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-71: setRequestHeader has too many header restrictions Ian Hickson
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback Jim Ley
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback Mark Nottingham
• Re: ISSUE-65: Should Window spec add parentWindow property to documents? Jonas Sicking
• Fwd: Unanticipated publication outage: 14-19 April Robin Berjon
• Re: ISSUE-59: Should Window 1.0 include history? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-60: Should Window Object 1.0 include access to frames by name (window.frames)? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-63: Should Window 1.0 drop the arguably redundant requirment on UIEvent.view? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-74: what does it mean for XHR to support more methods? Robin Berjon
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback Robin Berjon
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? Robin Berjon
• Re: ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? Gorm Haug Eriksen
• ISSUE-75: Is method case-sensitive? Web APIs Issue Tracker
• Re: First Public WD of XMLHttpRequest released Jim Ley
• ISSUE-74: what does it mean for XHR to support more methods? Web APIs Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Christophe Jolif
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Anne van Kesteren
• Re: First Public WD of XMLHttpRequest released Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Jonas Sicking
• Re: random notes on the XHR editorial notes Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Christophe Jolif
• ISSUE-73: Are we going to support non-ECMAScript languages? Web APIs Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-65: Should Window spec add parentWindow property to documents? Anne van Kesteren
• ISSUE-72: should XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget? Web APIs Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-71: setRequestHeader has too many header restrictions Web APIs Issue Tracker
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Object feedback Jim Ley
• XMLHttpRequest Object feedback Mark Nottingham
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren't being presented be required to have a null defaultView? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? Ian Hickson

Wednesday, 5 April 2006

• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-65: Should Window spec add parentWindow property to documents? Ian Hickson
• Re: First Public WD of XMLHttpRequest released Jim Ley
• Re: First Public WD of XMLHttpRequest released Jim Ley
• Re: random notes on the XHR editorial notes Jonas Sicking
• Re: First Public WD of XMLHttpRequest released Anne van Kesteren
• Re: First Public WD of XMLHttpRequest released Anne van Kesteren
• Re: random notes on the XHR editorial notes Robin Berjon
• Re: First Public WD of XMLHttpRequest released Robin Berjon
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: random notes on the XHR editorial notes Jonas Sicking
• Re: First Public WD of XMLHttpRequest released Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-65: Should Window spec add parentWindow property to documents? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-65: Should Window spec add parentWindow property to documents? Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Jonas Sicking
• Re: First Public WD of XMLHttpRequest released Jim Ley
• random notes on the XHR editorial notes Robin Berjon
• First Public WD of XMLHttpRequest released Robin Berjon
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? Robin Berjon
• Re: Some XHR comments Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Some XHR comments Boris Zbarsky
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? Jim Ley
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? Christophe Jolif
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? Brad Fults
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Christophe Jolif
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Jim Ley
• Re: ISSUE-65: Should Window spec add parentWindow property to documents? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XHR timeout and browsing context destruction Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? Jonas Sicking
• Re: Some XHR comments Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-65: Should Window spec add parentWindow property to documents? Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-65: Should Window spec add parentWindow property to documents? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-68: What to do about window.location.toString()? Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-67: Should resolution of relative URI references sent to location be defined in JS bindings or generally? Jonas Sicking
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? Jonas Sicking
• XHR timeout and browsing context destruction Stéphane Sire
• Re: ISSUE-65: Should Window spec add parentWindow property to documents? Jonas Sicking
• Re: Further update to Window Object 1.0, I think it's ready for first Working Draft Stéphane Sire
• Re: ISSUE-59: Should Window 1.0 include history? Jonas Sicking
• Re: ACTION-126: What is DOM3EV about... Stéphane Sire
• Re: Some XHR comments Cameron McCormack
• Re: Some XHR comments Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? Jim Ley
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? Brad Fults
• Re: Some XHR comments Cameron McCormack
• Some XHR comments Cameron McCormack

Tuesday, 4 April 2006

• Re: ISSUE-69: Should Location.reload() take an optional bool argument to force reload? Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-67: Should resolution of relative URI references sent to location (unknown charset) be defined in JS bindings or generally? Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Boris Zbarsky
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-65: Should Window spec add parentWindow property to documents? Ian Hickson
• Re: [SVGMobile12] event aliasing Jack Jansen
• Re: [SVGMobile12] event aliasing Stéphane Sire
• Re: ACTION-126: What is DOM3EV about... Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ACTION-126: What is DOM3EV about... Jim Ley
• ACTION-126: What is DOM3EV about... Anne van Kesteren
• ACTION-52 - open() and authentication Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? Robin Berjon
• Re: Further update to Window Object 1.0, I think it's ready for first Working Draft Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-68: What to do about window.location.toString()? Cameron McCormack
• Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? Cameron McCormack
• ISSUE-70: what to do about window timers? Web APIs Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-68: What to do about window.location.toString()? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-68: What to do about window.location.toString()? Anne van Kesteren
• ISSUE-69: Should Location.reload() take an optional bool argument to force reload? Web APIs Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-68: What to do about window.location.toString()? Web APIs Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-67: Should resolution of relative URI references sent to location be defined in JS bindings or generally? Web APIs Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren\'t being presented be required to have a null defaultView? Web APIs Issue Tracker

Monday, 3 April 2006

• Re: ACTION-48 Draft text for XHR listing commonly implemented properties and methods that we don't specify Łukasz Lach

Tuesday, 4 April 2006

• ISSUE-65: Should Window spec add parentWindow property to documents? Web APIs Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-64: Should the Window spec define Window\'s place in DOM event flow? Ian Hickson
• Re: ISSUE-59: Should Window 1.0 include history? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: ISSUE-64: Should the Window spec define Window\'s place in DOM event flow? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-64: Should the Window spec define Window\'s place in DOM event flow? Ian Hickson
• ISSUE-64: Should the Window spec define Window\'s place in DOM event flow? Web APIs Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-63: Should Window 1.0 drop the arguably redundant requirment on UIEvent.view? Web APIs Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-61: Should the Window spec drop any conformance requirements for AbstractViews besides the defaultView? Web APIs Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-61: Should the Window spec drop any conformance requirements for AbstractViews besides the defaultView? Web APIs Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-60: Should Window Object 1.0 include access to frames by name (window.frames)? Web APIs Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-59: Should Window 1.0 include history? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-59: Should Window 1.0 include history? Ian Hickson

Monday, 3 April 2006

• ISSUE-59: Should Window 1.0 include history? Web APIs Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Jim Ley
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Boris Zbarsky
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Anne van Kesteren
• XMLHttpRequestTestSuite in CVS Ian Davis
• Re: ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Boris Zbarsky
• Re: ACTION-87: Selectors API Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ACTION-87: Selectors API Anne van Kesteren
• ISSUE-58: XMLHttpRequest.abort() should just reset the object Web APIs Issue Tracker
• Re: [SVGMobile12] event aliasing Anne van Kesteren
• RE: [SVGMobile12] event aliasing Ian Hickson

Sunday, 2 April 2006

• Re: [SVGMobile12] event aliasing Jack Jansen
• RE: [SVGMobile12] event aliasing Jon Ferraiolo
• RE: [SVGMobile12] event aliasing Doug Schepers

Saturday, 1 April 2006

• Re: Further update to Window Object 1.0, I think it's ready for first Working Draft Jonas Sicking

Last message date: Saturday, 29 April 2006 18:05:31 UTC