Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility

On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 22:38:05 +0200, Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com> wrote:
> This is very silly, the VendorMember scheme is entirely stupid, it's  
> completely useless for authors, we can't do anything with it, and is  
> much worse than simple invented terms that eventually get standardised.

I didn't really like it either, I was hoping for comments :-) It seems  
extensibility in the DOM in general is a bit unaddressed.


> [...]
>
> Extension requirements similar to ECMAScript would be a much more  
> logical approach.

Pointer?


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Received on Friday, 21 April 2006 20:42:26 UTC