- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 08:43:01 +0200
- To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Robin Berjon" <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Cc: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>, "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 06:46:51 +0200, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: >> On Apr 21, 2006, at 00:18, Mark Nottingham wrote: >>> Make it a SHOULD and twiddle your CR exit criteria to take it into >>> account; in the long term, implementations will sort themselves out. >> >> My thoughts exactly. > > A specification that doesn't accurately represent what implementations do > is useless. Make it implementable, take into account feedback from > implementers who are telling you the constraints, and don't write a spec > that you know will not represent reality. My thoughts exactly... Twiddling with the exit criteria doesn't solve any of the problems. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 21 April 2006 06:43:20 UTC