- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 00:32:35 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 11:28:09 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > >>>> If that is indeed true we need to fix it I agree. Is there a >>>> sensible value we could set .status to for example? >>> >>> >>> Lets keep .status an HTTP status code. What about dispatching an >>> abort event on the object as I suggested? Not sure if that's >>> appropriate for this version though... >> >> >> We have already talked about setting .status to -1 in some error >> conditions. Aborting is arguably an error condition. > > I don't like that idea. I believe we also opted not to do it given that > people might depend on the way .status acts now in certain error > conditions. It also makes the attribute unnecessary complex. I don't think we have addressed error handling yet, so we should just include this case when we decide that. / Jonas
Received on Friday, 7 April 2006 07:32:40 UTC